Berghorn F J, Schafer D E
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1986;24(2):113-27. doi: 10.2190/bk83-8xme-kfjx-ud2g.
The results of experimental studies of reminiscing are not as uniformly optimistic about its therapeutic value as is the theoretical literature. Moreover, anecdotal evidence regarding the impact of reminiscence interventions is more positive than the statistical evidence. This study suggests reasons for these previous findings, and examines data from a discussion group intervention in thirty nursing homes, in which 185 residents completed pre- and posttests. It analyzes the characteristics of participants in relation to modifications in selected attitudes and behaviors over the intervention period. Analysis of variance and discriminant analysis revealed no significant relationships between attitudinal or behavioral modifications and demographic or other characteristics, with one exception. Value-choices made by participants were related to such modifications. The findings are interpreted in terms of the "mental adaptability" of participants and the compensatory nature of reminiscence in an institutional setting.
关于怀旧的实验研究结果,并不像理论文献那样对其治疗价值持一致乐观的态度。此外,关于怀旧干预影响的轶事证据比统计证据更为积极。本研究提出了这些先前研究结果的原因,并审视了来自三十家疗养院的一个讨论小组干预的数据,其中185名居民完成了前测和后测。它分析了参与者的特征与干预期间选定态度和行为变化之间的关系。方差分析和判别分析表明,态度或行为变化与人口统计学或其他特征之间没有显著关系,但有一个例外。参与者做出的价值选择与这些变化有关。研究结果根据参与者的“心理适应性”以及在机构环境中怀旧的补偿性质进行了解释。