• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依鲁替尼联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察:IKEMA 亚组分析

Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in East Asian patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2022 Oct;116(4):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03378-w. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.1007/s12185-022-03378-w
PMID:35578151
Abstract

In the phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), isatuximab (Isa) plus carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), compared with Kd. This IKEMA subgroup analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd among East Asian patients. Eligible patients had 1-3 prior lines of therapy and were stratified by number of prior lines and revised International Staging System. The primary endpoint was PFS. Key secondary endpoints included overall response, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and complete response (CR) rate. Forty-six East Asian patients (19 Japanese, 27 South Korean) were randomized to Isa-Kd (n = 25) or Kd (n = 21). Isa-Kd improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.23-1.76), ≥VGPR (80.0% vs 52.4%), MRD negativity rate (44.0% vs 9.5%), and CR (44.0% vs 23.8%). The rate of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 79% for Isa-Kd versus 55% for Kd. The rate of serious TEAEs was 46% versus 50%, and the rate of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 4% versus 10%. Overall, Isa-Kd improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, consistent with the overall IKEMA population.

摘要

在 3 期 IKEMA 研究(NCT03275285)中,与 Kd 相比,伊沙妥昔单抗(Isa)联合卡非佐米(K)和地塞米松(d)显著改善了复发多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。这项 IKEMA 亚组分析评估了 Isa-Kd 与 Kd 在东亚患者中的疗效和安全性。符合条件的患者接受了 1-3 线治疗,按既往治疗线数和修订后的国际分期系统分层。主要终点是 PFS。关键次要终点包括总缓解率、非常好的部分缓解或更好(≥VGPR)、微小残留病(MRD)阴性率和完全缓解(CR)率。46 例东亚患者(19 例日本患者,27 例韩国患者)被随机分配至 Isa-Kd(n=25)或 Kd(n=21)组。Isa-Kd 改善了 PFS(HR 0.64;95%CI 0.23-1.76)、≥VGPR(80.0% vs 52.4%)、MRD 阴性率(44.0% vs 9.5%)和 CR(44.0% vs 23.8%)。Isa-Kd 的治疗相关不良事件(TEAEs)发生率≥3 级为 79%,而 Kd 为 55%。严重 TEAEs 的发生率分别为 46%和 50%,因 TEAEs 而停药的发生率分别为 4%和 10%。总体而言,在东亚复发 MM 患者中,与 Kd 相比,Isa-Kd 提高了疗效和安全性,与 IKEMA 总体人群一致。

相似文献

1
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in East Asian patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.依鲁替尼联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察:IKEMA 亚组分析
Int J Hematol. 2022 Oct;116(4):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03378-w. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Updated IKEMA Subgroup Analysis.isatuximab联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗东亚复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:IKEMA研究组更新分析
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Oct;23(10):e360-e367. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.依沙佐米联合卡非佐米和地塞米松与卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤老年患者的疗效:IKEMA 亚组分析。
Hematol Oncol. 2022 Dec;40(5):1020-1029. doi: 10.1002/hon.3038. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation.依鲁替尼联合卡非佐米和地塞米松与卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:IKEMA 亚组分析(按既往移植情况)。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Feb;29(2):134.e1-134.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with early late relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.伊沙佐米联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗早期和晚期复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:IKEMA 亚组分析。
Haematologica. 2024 Feb 1;109(2):604-616. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283073.
6
Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma.伊沙佐米联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤的反应深度和反应动力学。
Blood Adv. 2022 Aug 9;6(15):4506-4515. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006713.
7
Isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in 1q21+ patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Long-term outcomes in the Phase 3 IKEMA study.伊沙妥昔单抗联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗 1q21 异常的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者:3 期 IKEMA 研究的长期结果。
Hematol Oncol. 2024 Mar;42(2):e3258. doi: 10.1002/hon.3258.
8
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics: IKEMA subgroup analysis.高危细胞遗传学的复发多发性骨髓瘤患者中伊沙妥昔单抗联合卡非佐米和地塞米松:IKEMA 亚组分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Nov;109(5):504-512. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13835. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: IKEMA subgroup analysis.依鲁替尼联合卡非佐米和地塞米松与卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗伴有肾功能损害的复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:IKEMA 亚组分析。
Haematologica. 2022 Jun 1;107(6):1397-1409. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279229.
10
Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results from IKEMA, a randomized Phase 3 study.依鲁替尼、卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:IKEMA 随机 3 期研究的更新结果。
Blood Cancer J. 2023 May 9;13(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00797-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Phase 1 study of isatuximab monotherapy in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.伊沙妥昔单抗单药治疗中国复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的 1 期研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 11;14(1):27550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59186-1.
2
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: subgroup analysis of the randomized, open label, phase 3 IKEMA study.isatuximab联合卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗日本复发多发性骨髓瘤患者:随机、开放标签、3期IKEMA研究的亚组分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;52(12):1446-1449. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac137.