Suppr超能文献

工作组织和职业心理社会因素暴露方面的种族和民族差异。

Racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of work organization and occupational psychosocial exposures.

机构信息

Public Health Program, School of Arts and Sciences, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2022 Jul;65(7):567-575. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23368. Epub 2022 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

This study sought to assess if there were differences in exposure to job insecurity, shift work, work-life imbalance, workplace harassment, and nonstandard work arrangements according to race and ethnicity in the United States.

METHODS

Using data from the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey conducted in 2015, we calculated the prevalence of job insecurity, shift work, work-life imbalance, workplace harassment, and nonstandard work arrangements according to race and ethnicity. Using this data, we then modeled the prevalence of these exposures while adjusting for covariates including occupation.

RESULTS

Compared to non-Hispanic White workers, Hispanic (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30, 1.66) and non-Hispanic Asian (PR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.28, 1.92) workers reported more job insecurity. Non-Hispanic Black workers were more likely to report working in shifts (PR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.22, 1.46) and Hispanic workers reported being employed in alternative work arrangements (PR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.23, 1.58) more often than non-Hispanic White workers. Non-Hispanic White workers were slightly more likely to report work-life imbalance and workplace harassment than other races/ethnicities. Occupational segregation accounted for some of the racial/ethnic differences in shift work and alternative work arrangements.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are consistent with some previous research on differences in the prevalence of these work organization and psychosocial exposures by race/ethnicity, especially with respect to shift work and alternative work arrangements. However, other studies have found contradictory findings, especially with respect to workplace harassment. There is a need for future research that tackles the association between these exposures and racial/ethnic health disparities.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在美国,种族和民族是否会对工作不安全感、轮班工作、工作与生活失衡、工作场所骚扰和非标准工作安排的暴露程度存在差异。

方法

利用 2015 年全国代表性的国家健康访谈调查的数据,我们根据种族和民族计算了工作不安全感、轮班工作、工作与生活失衡、工作场所骚扰和非标准工作安排的流行率。使用这些数据,我们在调整了包括职业在内的协变量后,建立了这些暴露因素的流行率模型。

结果

与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔(患病率比 [PR] = 1.47,95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.30,1.66)和非西班牙裔亚裔(PR = 1.57,95% CI = 1.28,1.92)工人报告的工作不安全感更高。非西班牙裔黑人更有可能报告轮班工作(PR = 1.34,95% CI = 1.22,1.46),而西班牙裔工人报告更常从事非标准工作安排(PR = 1.40,95% CI = 1.23,1.58),而非西班牙裔白人。非西班牙裔白人比其他种族/民族更容易报告工作与生活失衡和工作场所骚扰。职业隔离解释了种族/民族在轮班工作和非标准工作安排方面的一些差异。

结论

这些发现与之前一些关于这些工作组织和心理社会暴露因素在种族/民族之间的流行率差异的研究结果一致,尤其是在轮班工作和非标准工作安排方面。然而,其他研究得出了相反的结论,尤其是在工作场所骚扰方面。未来需要研究这些暴露因素与种族/民族健康差异之间的关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验