• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欺凌行为中的社会地位与情绪能力:一项从幼儿园到小学过渡阶段的纵向研究。

Social Status and Emotional Competence in Bullying: A Longitudinal Study of the Transition From Kindergarten to Primary School.

作者信息

Farina Eleonora, Belacchi Carmen

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences for Education R. Massa, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Department of Communication Sciences, Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:817245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817245. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817245
PMID:35578656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9106559/
Abstract

Moving on to a higher level of schooling represents a crucial developmental challenge for children: studies have shown that transitioning to a new school context can increase the perceived importance of peer acceptance, popularity, and adaptation to the new social environment. The aim of this study was to investigate simultaneously the influence of interpersonal variables (social status indices) and personal variables (empathy and understanding of emotions) on role-taking in bullying episodes (hostile, prosocial, victim, and outsider roles) from a longitudinal perspective. These variables were assessed on 41 children in their last year of kindergarten (t1) and in their 1st year of primary school (t2). The main longitudinal results showed that prosocial behaviors are more stable than hostile, victim, and outsider behaviors. Moreover, social preference-together with affective empathy-at t1 had a clear negative predictive effect on hostile roles at t2, while social preference had a positive effect on prosocial roles at t2. Social impact at t1 negatively predicted being a victim at t2. On the other hand, social preference at t2 was negatively predicted only by the victim role at t1. Social impact at t1 had a significant and negative effect on being victimized at t2 while was negatively predicted at t2 by the outsider at t1. Our study-even if exploratory-seems to highlight the existence of a specific, differentiate effect of two distinct social status indices on the participant role-taking in bullying episodes in the transitional period from kindergarten to primary school.

摘要

进入更高层次的学校教育对儿童来说是一项至关重要的发展挑战

研究表明,过渡到新的学校环境会增加同伴接纳、受欢迎程度以及适应新社会环境的重要性。本研究的目的是从纵向角度同时调查人际变量(社会地位指标)和个人变量(同理心和情绪理解)对欺凌事件中角色承担(敌对、亲社会、受害者和旁观者角色)的影响。在41名处于幼儿园最后一年(t1)和小学一年级(t2)的儿童中对这些变量进行了评估。主要的纵向研究结果表明,亲社会行为比敌对、受害者和旁观者行为更稳定。此外,t1时的社会偏好以及情感同理心对t2时的敌对角色有明显的负向预测作用,而社会偏好对t2时的亲社会角色有正向作用。t1时的社会影响对t2时成为受害者有负向预测作用。另一方面,t2时的社会偏好仅由t1时的受害者角色负向预测。t1时的社会影响对t2时成为受害者有显著的负向作用,而t1时的旁观者对t2时有负向预测作用。我们的研究——即使是探索性的——似乎也凸显了在从幼儿园到小学的过渡阶段,两种不同的社会地位指标对欺凌事件中参与者角色承担存在特定的、有差异的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/9106559/0179f60c2f36/fpsyg-13-817245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/9106559/bab2bd7f6462/fpsyg-13-817245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/9106559/0179f60c2f36/fpsyg-13-817245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/9106559/bab2bd7f6462/fpsyg-13-817245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/9106559/0179f60c2f36/fpsyg-13-817245-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Status and Emotional Competence in Bullying: A Longitudinal Study of the Transition From Kindergarten to Primary School.欺凌行为中的社会地位与情绪能力:一项从幼儿园到小学过渡阶段的纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:817245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817245. eCollection 2022.
2
Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference.幼儿园中的欺凌行为:参与者角色、社会能力与社会偏好之间的关联
Aggress Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):310-21. doi: 10.1002/ab.21541. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
Prosocial/hostile roles and emotion comprehension in preschoolers.幼儿的亲社会/敌对角色和情绪理解。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):371-89. doi: 10.1002/ab.20361.
4
Early risk factors for being a bully, victim, or bully/victim in late elementary and early secondary education. The longitudinal TRAILS study.早期风险因素对成为恶霸、受害者或恶霸/受害者在小学后期和初中早期。纵向轨迹研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 6;11:440. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-440.
5
Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: a three wave longitudinal analysis.同伴群体中欺凌行为的成本和收益:一项三波纵向分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Nov;41(8):1217-29. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9759-3.
6
Perspective Taking Ability in Psychologically Maltreated Children: A Protective Factor in Peer Social Adjustment.受心理虐待儿童的观点采择能力:同伴社交适应中的一个保护因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:816514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816514. eCollection 2022.
7
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
8
Disability, poverty, and other risk factors associated with involvement in bullying behaviors.残疾、贫困和其他与欺凌行为相关的风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Feb;78:115-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
9
New Approaches to Defender and Outsider Roles in School Bullying.学校欺凌中防御者和局外人角色的新方法。
Child Dev. 2020 Jul;91(4):e814-e832. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13312. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
10
Individual and social network predictors of the short-term stability of bullying victimization in the United Kingdom and Germany.个体和社交网络因素对英国和德国儿童短期受欺凌稳定性的预测。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):225-40. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02022.x. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of Bullying in Early Childhood Education in Spain: Pre-School Teachers vs. Psychologists.西班牙幼儿教育中的欺凌认知:学前教师与心理学家的对比
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):655-670. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13030050.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Victimisation in Early Childhood; Observations of Participant Roles and Sex Differences.幼儿期的同伴侵害;参与者角色和性别差异的观察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020415.
2
Methodological Choices in Peer Nomination Research.同伴提名研究中的方法选择
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2017 Sep;2017(157):21-44. doi: 10.1002/cad.20206.
3
Predicting Adolescents' Bullying Participation from Developmental Trajectories of Social Status and Behavior.预测青少年欺凌参与:社会地位和行为发展轨迹的作用。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):1157-1176. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12794. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
Feeling and thinking of others: affective and cognitive empathy and emotion comprehension in prosocial/hostile preschoolers.对他人的感受与思考:亲社会/敌对型学龄前儿童的情感与认知共情及情绪理解
Aggress Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;38(2):150-65. doi: 10.1002/ab.21415.
5
Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference.幼儿园中的欺凌行为:参与者角色、社会能力与社会偏好之间的关联
Aggress Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):310-21. doi: 10.1002/ab.21541. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
A cross-national comparison of aggressors, victims and defenders in preschools in England, Spain and Italy.一项关于英格兰、西班牙和意大利幼儿园中攻击者、受害者和保护者的跨国比较。
Span J Psychol. 2011 May;14(1):133-44. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n1.11.
7
The development of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early elementary school children: the role of peer rejection.早期小学生中行为问题和抑郁症状的发展:同伴拒绝的作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(2):245-53. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.546045.
8
Prosocial/hostile roles and emotion comprehension in preschoolers.幼儿的亲社会/敌对角色和情绪理解。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):371-89. doi: 10.1002/ab.20361.
9
Ready to make nice: parental socialization of young sons' and daughters' prosocial behaviors with peers.准备好表现友善:父母对年幼子女与同伴亲社会行为的社会化培养。
J Genet Psychol. 2007 Jun;168(2):177-200. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.168.2.177-200.
10
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.