Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Princeton University Library, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0264913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264913. eCollection 2022.
The primary goal of this paper was to investigate an old question in a new way: what are the search patterns that professionals demonstrate when faced with a specific knowledge gap?
We examine data from a cascading survey question design that captures details about searching for information to answer a self-nominated clinical question from 1027 dental professionals enrolled in the National Dental Practice Based Research Network. Descriptive and conditional logistical regression analysis techniques were used.
61% of professionals in our sample choose informal sources of information, with only about 11% looking to formal peer reviewed evidence. The numbers of professionals turning to general internet searches is more than twice as high as any other information source other than professional colleagues. Dentists with advanced training and specialists are significantly more likely to consult peer-reviewed sources, and women in the sample were more likely than men to continue searching past a first source.
Speed/availability of information may be just as, or in some cases, more important than credibility for professionals' search behavior. Additionally, our findings suggest that more insights are needed into how various categories of professionals within a profession seek information differently.
本文的主要目标是以一种新的方式探讨一个旧问题:当面对特定的知识空白时,专业人员展示了哪些搜索模式?
我们检查了来自级联调查问题设计的数据,该设计从全国牙科实践基于研究网络中招募的 1027 名牙科专业人员那里获取了有关搜索信息以回答自我提名的临床问题的详细信息。使用了描述性和条件逻辑回归分析技术。
我们样本中 61%的专业人员选择了非正式的信息来源,只有约 11%的人寻求正式的同行评审证据。专业人员进行一般互联网搜索的人数是除专业同事之外其他任何信息来源的两倍多。接受过高级培训的牙医和专家更有可能查阅同行评审的来源,而样本中的女性比男性更有可能在第一来源之后继续搜索。
对于专业人员的搜索行为而言,信息的速度/可用性可能与可信度一样重要,或者在某些情况下甚至更重要。此外,我们的研究结果表明,需要更深入地了解一个专业内部的不同类别的专业人员如何以不同的方式搜索信息。