Suppr超能文献

口腔医师对在线信息资源的使用:来自口腔实践研究网络的研究结果。

Use of online sources of information by dental practitioners: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA HealthPartners Dental Group, and HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark General dentistry private practice, Alabaster, AL, USA Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 2014 Winter;74(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00373.x. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Estimate the proportion of dental practitioners who use online sources of information for practice guidance.

METHODS

From a survey of 657 dental practitioners in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, four indicators of online use for practice guidance were calculated: read journals online, obtained continuing education (CDE) through online sources, rated an online source as most influential, and reported frequently using an online source for guidance. Demographics, journals read, and use of various sources of information for practice guidance in terms of frequency and influence were ascertained for each.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 percent (n = 138) were classified into one of the four indicators of online use: 14 percent (n = 89) rated an online source as most influential and 13 percent (n = 87) reported frequently using an online source for guidance; few practitioners (5 percent, n = 34) read journals online, fewer (3 percent, n = 17) obtained CDE through online sources. Use of online information sources varied considerably by region and practice characteristics. In general, the four indicators represented practitioners with as many differences as similarities to each other and to offline users.

CONCLUSION

A relatively small proportion of dental practitioners use information from online sources for practice guidance. Variation exists regarding practitioners' use of online source resources and how they rate the value of offline information sources for practice guidance.

摘要

目的

评估将在线信息源用于实践指导的牙医的比例。

方法

从 The Dental Practice-Based Research Network 的 657 名牙医调查中,计算了用于实践指导的在线使用的四个指标:在线阅读期刊、通过在线来源获得继续教育 (CDE)、将在线来源评为最具影响力、以及报告经常使用在线来源进行指导。确定了每个指标的人口统计学特征、阅读期刊以及各种实践指导信息源的使用频率和影响力。

结果

总体而言,21%(n=138)被归入四个在线使用指标之一:14%(n=89)将在线来源评为最具影响力,13%(n=87)报告经常使用在线来源进行指导;很少有牙医(5%,n=34)在线阅读期刊,更少(3%,n=17)通过在线来源获得 CDE。在线信息源的使用因地区和实践特征而异。一般来说,这四个指标代表了与彼此以及离线用户有许多不同之处的牙医。

结论

相对较少的牙医将在线信息源用于实践指导。关于从业者对在线来源资源的使用以及他们对离线信息源在实践指导中的价值的评价存在差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
A characterization of professional media and its links to research.专业媒体的特征及其与研究的联系。
Scientometrics. 2019 May;119(2):827-843. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03072-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

3
Practice options for new dentists.新牙医的执业选择。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Aug;141(8):1023-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0318.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验