National Centre for Audiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):411-426. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00247. Epub 2022 May 17.
The digital health revolution has brought forward integral technological advancements enabling virtual care as a readily accessible delivery model. Despite this forward momentum, the field of audiology still faces barriers that impede the uptake of virtual services into routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to gather, synthesize, and summarize the literature around virtual hearing aid intervention studies and the related technology and infrastructure requirements.
A scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Nursing and Allied Health, and Web of Science databases. Objectives, inclusion criteria, and scoping review methods were specified in advance and documented in a protocol.
The 11 studies identified through this review related to virtual hearing aid services delivered by a licensed health care provider and/or facilitator(s) specific to hearing aid management, programming, verification, and validation services. Service delivery models varied according to patient population, technology experience, type(s) and time course of care, type of remote location, and technology/support requirements. Barriers and facilitators to implementation-related themes including technology access and function, client sociotechnical, convenience, education and training, interaction quality, service delivery, and technology innovation.
This scoping review provides evidence around the technology and infrastructure required for full integration of virtual hearing aid services into practice and according to care type. Low-tech versus high-tech requirements may be used to guide virtual service delivery triaging efforts. Research and development efforts in the areas of pediatrics, clinical support tools, and hearing aid/app-based solutions will support further uptake of virtual service delivery in audiology.
数字健康革命带来了整体技术进步,使虚拟护理成为一种易于获得的交付模式。尽管这一趋势向前推进,但听力学领域仍然存在障碍,阻碍了虚拟服务纳入常规临床实践。本研究旨在收集、综合和总结有关虚拟助听器干预研究以及相关技术和基础设施要求的文献。
使用 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、Nursing and Allied Health 和 Web of Science 数据库进行范围审查。预先指定了目标、纳入标准和范围审查方法,并在协议中记录下来。
通过本次审查确定的 11 项研究涉及由持牌医疗保健提供者和/或特定于助听器管理、编程、验证和验证服务的(多个)促进者提供的虚拟助听器服务。服务交付模式根据患者人群、技术经验、护理类型和时间进程、远程位置类型以及技术/支持要求而有所不同。与实施相关主题的障碍和促进因素包括技术访问和功能、客户社会技术、便利性、教育和培训、交互质量、服务交付和技术创新。
本范围审查提供了有关将虚拟助听器服务全面整合到实践中所需的技术和基础设施的证据,具体取决于护理类型。低技术与高科技要求可用于指导虚拟服务交付分诊工作。在儿科、临床支持工具和助听器/基于应用的解决方案领域的研究和开发工作将支持听力学中虚拟服务交付的进一步采用。