Suppr超能文献

三例临床意义上不准确的碳氧血红蛋白测量案例。

Three cases of clinically significant inaccurate carboxyhemoglobin measurement.

机构信息

Hyperbaric Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah U.S.

LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.

出版信息

Undersea Hyperb Med. 2022 Second Quarter;49(2):171-177.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians often rely on measurement of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) to confirm or rule out a diagnosis of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.

METHODS

We report two cases of false negative COHb in patients with CO poisoning and one case of false positive COHb in a patient without CO poisoning.

RESULTS

In the first case, a 20-year-old male developed headache, confusion, and near-syncope while operating a gasoline-powered pressure washer in an enclosed space. In the emergency department (ED), his COHb was 1.8%, but this level was disregarded, and he was referred for hyperbaric oxygen. His COHb just before hyperbaric oxygen was 4.1%, and later analysis of his blood collected at ED arrival revealed a COHb of 20.1%. The referral ED blood gas machine calibration and controls were within specification. In the second case, a 45-year-old male presented with several others to the ED with symptoms of CO poisoning after exposure at a conference. All others had elevated COHb levels, but his COHb was 2%. He was discharged but returned shortly with continued symptoms and requested his COHb be repeated. The repeat COHb was 17% (84 minutes after the first). After three hours of oxygen, his COHb was 7%. In the final case, an 83-year-old non-smoking male presented to an ED with breathlessness and tachypnea and was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. His COHb was 7.1%, but he reported living in an all-electric home. Another adult who lived with him and rode with him to the ED was asymptomatic and had a COHb of 3%. Later, COHb of 1.9% was measured from blood collected at ED arrival, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry confirmed this result (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

COHb levels are not always accurate. Clinicians should use clinical judgment to manage their patients, including rejecting laboratory values that do not fit the clinical situation.

摘要

背景

临床医生通常依赖于检测碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)来确诊或排除一氧化碳(CO)中毒。

方法

我们报告了两例 CO 中毒患者的 COHb 假阴性和一例非 CO 中毒患者的 COHb 假阳性病例。

结果

在第一个病例中,一名 20 岁男性在封闭空间内操作汽油动力清洗机时出现头痛、意识模糊和近乎晕厥。在急诊科(ED),他的 COHb 为 1.8%,但这一水平被忽略,他被转介高压氧治疗。他在接受高压氧治疗前的 COHb 为 4.1%,后来对他在 ED 就诊时采集的血液进行分析显示 COHb 为 20.1%。转诊 ED 血气仪的校准和对照均在规定范围内。在第二个病例中,一名 45 岁男性与其他几人在会议上暴露后出现 CO 中毒症状到 ED 就诊。其他几人 COHb 水平升高,但他的 COHb 为 2%。他被出院,但不久后因持续症状返回并要求重复检测 COHb。第二次 COHb 为 17%(第一次后 84 分钟)。吸氧 3 小时后,他的 COHb 为 7%。在最后一个病例中,一名 83 岁不吸烟男性因呼吸困难和呼吸急促到 ED 就诊,被诊断为 COVID-19 肺炎。他的 COHb 为 7.1%,但他报告居住在全电家庭。与他同住并陪他去 ED 的另一名成年人无症状,COHb 为 3%。后来,从 ED 就诊时采集的血液中测量到 COHb 为 1.9%,气相色谱/质谱分析证实了这一结果(2%)。

结论

COHb 水平并不总是准确的。临床医生应根据临床情况判断管理患者,包括拒绝与临床情况不符的实验室值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验