Suppr超能文献

填补证据、政策与实践之间的差距:“45岁及以上研究”的研究者们是否在规划影响力?

Filling the gap between evidence, policy and practice: are 45 and Up Study researchers planning for impact?

作者信息

Ha Tam C, McNamara Martin, Melo Luciano, Frost Emma K, Moore Gabriel M

机构信息

University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia; The Sax Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia;

The Sax Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Res Pract. 2023 Mar 15;33(1):32122207. doi: 10.17061/phrp32122207.

Abstract

AIM

To improve health outcomes, policy and practice decisions should be guided by relevant and timely evidence. High-quality, large-scale population data could play an essential role in supporting evidence-based decision making. The 45 and Up Study is a long-term, large-scale cohort study with more 250 000 participants aged 45 years and over from New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Data collected by the Study is accessible to researchers, government and non-governmental bodies. The study aimed to identify the proportion of researchers using data from the Study who intended to have an impact and achieved impact; the types of impact they intended and achieved; and the pathways through which they achieved it.

METHODS

Using data extracted from the application, progress and final report documents for 25 projects using 45 and Up Study data from January 2011 until December 2017, we a) determined the proportion of projects that intended to have policy or practice impact and b) described the type of policy and practice impact achieved.

RESULTS

We found that 88% ( = 22) of projects intended to have a policy or practice impact. Of those, 68% ( = 15) planned to influence or inform a policy or program, and 41% ( = 9) planned to share findings at conferences or in journals. Almost half of projects with intended impact (45%, = 10) did not state how they planned to achieve impact. Approximately 16% of all projects ( = 4) reported achieving an impact on policy or services. The type of impact achieved by all four of these projects was influencing, informing or changing a policy or program. One of these four projects also achieved a change to legislation or regulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Further strategies to promote a targeted approach to impact planning in research projects using datasets such as the 45 and Up Study would help guide researchers in achieving impact.

摘要

目的

为改善健康状况,政策和实践决策应以相关且及时的证据为指导。高质量的大规模人群数据在支持循证决策方面可发挥重要作用。“45岁及以上研究”是一项长期的大规模队列研究,参与者超过25万,年龄在45岁及以上,来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)。该研究收集的数据可供研究人员、政府和非政府机构使用。本研究旨在确定使用该研究数据的研究人员中,打算产生影响并实际产生影响的比例;他们打算和实际产生的影响类型;以及他们实现影响的途径。

方法

利用从2011年1月至2017年12月使用“45岁及以上研究”数据的25个项目的申请、进展和最终报告文件中提取的数据,我们a)确定打算产生政策或实践影响的项目比例,以及b)描述所实现的政策和实践影响类型。

结果

我们发现88%(n = 22)的项目打算产生政策或实践影响。其中,68%(n = 15)计划影响或为政策或项目提供信息,41%(n = 9)计划在会议或期刊上分享研究结果。几乎一半有预期影响的项目(45%,n = 10)没有说明他们计划如何实现影响。所有项目中约16%(n = 4)报告对政策或服务产生了影响。这四个项目所实现的影响类型都是影响、为政策或项目提供信息或改变政策或项目。这四个项目中的一个还实现了法律法规的变更。

结论

采取进一步策略,促进在使用“45岁及以上研究”等数据集的研究项目中采用有针对性的影响规划方法,将有助于指导研究人员实现影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验