Suppr超能文献

关系自主性与痴呆症护理中的临床关系。

Relational autonomy and the clinical relationship in dementia care.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Center for Neurotechnology and Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):277-288. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09580-5. Epub 2022 May 17.

Abstract

The clinical relationship (or doctor-patient relationship) has been underexplored in dementia care. This is in part due to the way that the clinical relationship has been articulated and understood in bioethics. Robert Veatch's social contract model is representative of a standard view of the clinical relationship in bioethics. But dementia presents formidable challenges to the standard clinical relationship, including ambiguity about when the clinical relationship begins, how it weathers changes in narrative identity of patients with dementia, and how the intimate involvement of family fits alongside a paradigmatically dyadic relationship. Drawing on work in recent feminist theory, a critique is offered of the standard clinical relationship in bioethics as underwritten by an individualistic conception of autonomy. An alternative view of the clinical relationship in dementia, one that embraces a relational account of autonomy, is put forward.

摘要

在痴呆症护理中,临床关系(或医患关系)一直未得到充分探讨。这在一定程度上是由于临床关系在生命伦理学中的表述和理解方式。罗伯特·维特的社会契约模型是生命伦理学中标准临床关系的代表。但是,痴呆症给标准的临床关系带来了巨大的挑战,包括临床关系何时开始、如何经受住痴呆症患者叙事身份变化的考验,以及家庭的亲密介入如何与典型的二元关系相契合等问题。本研究借鉴了最近女性主义理论的研究成果,对生命伦理学中标准临床关系进行了批判,认为其基础是自主的个人主义概念。本文提出了一种在痴呆症中重新看待临床关系的观点,即接受自主的关系论。

相似文献

1
Relational autonomy and the clinical relationship in dementia care.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):277-288. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09580-5. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Understanding autonomy relationally: toward a reconfiguration of bioethical principles.
J Med Philos. 2001 Aug;26(4):365-86. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.4.365.3012.
3
The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine.
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(2):34-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1120793.
4
Sick autonomy.
Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Fall;46(4):484-95. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0093.
5
Autonomy, interdependence, and assisted suicide: respecting boundaries/crossing lines.
Bioethics. 2000 Jul;14(3):187-204. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00190.
6
Reconsidering the 'self' in self-management of chronic illness: Lessons from relational autonomy.
Nurs Inq. 2019 Jul;26(3):e12292. doi: 10.1111/nin.12292. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Philosophical feminist bioethics: past, present, and future.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr;24(2):165-74. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000474.
8
Reconceptualizing Autonomy: A Relational Turn in Bioethics.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 May;46(3):11-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.544. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Advance care planning with chronically ill patients: A relational autonomy approach.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):360-371. doi: 10.1177/0969733019848031. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Acknowledging vulnerability in ethics of palliative care - A feminist ethics approach.
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Jun;29(4):952-961. doi: 10.1177/09697330211072361. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

2
The philosopher as partner: an introduction to the scholarship of Robert M. Veatch.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09572-5. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验