Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Jun;29(4):952-961. doi: 10.1177/09697330211072361. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
Patients in need of palliative care are often described as vulnerable. Being vulnerable can sometimes be interpreted as the opposite of being autonomous, if an autonomous person is seen as an independent, self-sufficient person who forms decisions independently of others. Such a dichotomous view can create a situation where one has experiences of vulnerability that cannot be reconciled with the central ethical principle of autonomy. The article presents a feminist ethical perspective on the conceptualisation of vulnerability in the context of palliative care. It does so through the lens of the concepts of inherent and pathogenic vulnerability from the taxonomy on vulnerability suggested by Mackenzie et al. To differentiate between forms of vulnerability, is important since even though vulnerability can be regarded as a shared life condition it can be the product of practices creating harm to the patient. The article also presents an analysis of how vulnerability can be included in the interpretation of the ethical principle of autonomy, in order to be relevant in palliative care where vulnerability is salient, namely, as relational autonomy. Furthermore, two practical implications for nursing practice are suggested. Firstly, to acknowledge vulnerability as a shared life condition one needs training in order to neither be overwhelmed by one's own vulnerability, nor become invulnerable when facing vulnerability in others. Secondly, to foster relational autonomy includes navigating between the patient exercising their autonomy within a framework of relations, and shielding the patient from paternalistic practices. Nurses could be particularly suited for this role, which includes creating an environment which is open and supportive; navigating between patient, family and staff; seeing and acknowledging the complex situation in which patient autonomy is actually played out; and promoting patient autonomy.
需要姑息治疗的患者通常被描述为脆弱的。如果一个自主的人被视为一个独立的、自给自足的人,能够独立于他人做出决策,那么脆弱有时可能会被解读为与自主性相反的概念。这种二分法的观点可能会导致一种情况,即一个人经历了无法与自主性这一核心伦理原则相协调的脆弱性。本文从麦金太尔等人提出的脆弱性分类学中的固有脆弱性和致病脆弱性概念的角度,提出了一种女性主义伦理视角来看待姑息治疗中脆弱性的概念化。为了区分脆弱性的形式,这一点很重要,因为尽管脆弱性可以被视为一种共同的生活状况,但它也可能是造成患者伤害的实践的产物。本文还分析了如何将脆弱性纳入对自主性伦理原则的解释中,以便在姑息治疗中具有相关性,因为在姑息治疗中,脆弱性是突出的,即作为关系自主性。此外,还提出了对护理实践的两个实际影响。首先,要承认脆弱性是一种共同的生活状况,就需要进行培训,以免被自己的脆弱性所淹没,也不要在面对他人的脆弱性时变得无懈可击。其次,促进关系自主性包括在患者在关系框架内行使自主权和保护患者免受家长式作风的实践之间进行导航。护士可能特别适合这个角色,包括营造开放和支持的环境;在患者、家属和工作人员之间进行导航;看到并承认患者自主性实际发挥作用的复杂情况;并促进患者自主性。