• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于预期的盲视:关于物体类别的预测会阻碍对焦点关注物体的意识。

Expectation-based blindness: Predictions about object categories gate awareness of focally attended objects.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1879-1889. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02116-x. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02116-x
PMID:35581491
Abstract

Selective attention gates access to conscious awareness, resulting in surprising failures to notice clearly visible but unattended objects ('inattentional blindness'). Here, we demonstrate that expectations can have a similar effect, even for fully attended objects ('expectation-based blindness'). In three experiments, participants (N = 613) were presented with rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams at fixation and had to identify a target object indicated by a cue. Target category was repeated for the first 19 trials but unexpectedly changed on trial 20. The probability of correct target reports on this surprise trial was substantially lower than on preceding and subsequent trials. This impairment was present for switches between target letters and digits, and also for changes between human and animal face images. In contrast, no drop in accuracy was observed for novel target objects from the same category as previous targets. These results demonstrate that predictions about object categories affect visual awareness. Objects that are task relevant and focally attended often fail to get noticed when their category changes unexpectedly.

摘要

选择性注意控制着意识知觉的通达,导致人们对明显可见但未被注意的物体(“疏忽性盲视”)视而不见。在这里,我们证明了期望也会产生类似的效果,即使是对于完全被注意的物体(“基于期望的盲视”)也是如此。在三个实验中,参与者(N=613)在注视点接受快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)流,并被要求识别由线索指示的目标对象。在最初的 19 次试验中,目标类别是重复的,但在第 20 次试验中出乎意料地发生了变化。在这个意外试验中,正确报告目标的概率明显低于之前和之后的试验。这种损害既存在于目标字母和数字之间的转换,也存在于人类和动物面部图像之间的转换。相比之下,当新目标物体与之前的目标属于同一类别时,准确性并没有下降。这些结果表明,关于物体类别的预测会影响视觉意识。当物体的类别出乎意料地发生变化时,即使是那些与任务相关且被聚焦注意的物体,也常常会被忽视。

相似文献

1
Expectation-based blindness: Predictions about object categories gate awareness of focally attended objects.基于预期的盲视:关于物体类别的预测会阻碍对焦点关注物体的意识。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1879-1889. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02116-x. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.我们身边的大猩猩:对动态事件的持续性注意力盲视
Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74. doi: 10.1068/p281059.
3
The visible gorilla: Unexpected fast-not physically salient-Objects are noticeable.可见的大猩猩:意想不到的快速——不是物理上显著的——物体是显而易见的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2214930120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214930120. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Similarity of an unexpected object to the attended and ignored objects affects noticing in a sustained inattentional blindness task.在持续的非注意盲视任务中,意外物体与被关注和被忽略物体的相似性会影响对其的察觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2150-2169. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02794-2. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Surprise capture and inattentional blindness.意外捕获与无意视盲。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Not quite so blind: Semantic processing despite inattentional blindness.并非完全视而不见:尽管存在无意视盲,但仍有语义加工。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Apr;42(4):459-63. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000205. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Feature-based inattentional blindness: loss of awareness to featural information in fully attended objects.基于特征的无意视盲:对完全被注意对象的特征信息失去意识。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Nov;76(8):2229-39. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0712-5.
8
The role of unattended distractors in sustained inattentional blindness.未被注意的干扰物在持续性注意盲视中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0072-4. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
9
How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness.如何不被看见:相似性和选择性忽略对持续性注意盲视的影响
Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303.
10
The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness.注意定势、工作记忆容量和预期对无意视盲的影响。
Perception. 2016 Apr;45(4):386-99. doi: 10.1177/0301006615614465. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention and feature binding in the temporal domain.时间域中的注意力与特征绑定
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2599-2610. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02493-5. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference.长期记忆在视觉工作记忆测试中的作用:前摄促进但无前摄干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000302. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Attribute amnesia reflects a lack of memory consolidation for attended information.属性失忆反映了对所关注信息缺乏记忆巩固。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb;42(2):225-34. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000133. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
3
Change blindness and inattentional blindness.
变化盲视和疏忽盲视。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;2(5):529-546. doi: 10.1002/wcs.130. Epub 2011 Mar 1.