Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Genet Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;46(5-6):303-316. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22455. Epub 2022 May 18.
Genome-wide association studies have provided many genetic markers that can be used as instrumental variables to adjust for confounding in epidemiological studies. Recently, the principle has been applied to other forms of bias in observational studies, especially collider bias that arises when conditioning or stratifying on a variable that is associated with the outcome of interest. An important case is in studies of disease progression and survival. Here, we clarify the links between the genetic instrumental variable methods proposed for this problem and the established methods of Mendelian randomisation developed to account for confounding. We highlight the critical importance of weak instrument bias in this context and describe a corrected weighted least-squares procedure as a simple approach to reduce this bias. We illustrate the range of available methods on two data examples. The first, waist-hip ratio adjusted for body-mass index, entails statistical adjustment for a quantitative trait. The second, smoking cessation, is a stratified analysis conditional on having initiated smoking. In both cases, we find little effect of collider bias on the primary association results, but this may propagate into more substantial effects on further analyses such as polygenic risk scoring and Mendelian randomisation.
全基因组关联研究提供了许多遗传标记,可以用作工具变量来调整流行病学研究中的混杂因素。最近,这一原则已被应用于观察性研究中的其他形式的偏差,特别是当在与感兴趣的结果相关的变量上进行条件或分层时出现的混杂偏差。一个重要的情况是在疾病进展和生存研究中。在这里,我们阐明了为解决这一问题提出的遗传工具变量方法与为解决混杂因素而开发的孟德尔随机化的既定方法之间的联系。我们强调了在这种情况下弱工具变量偏差的重要性,并描述了一种校正加权最小二乘法程序作为减少这种偏差的简单方法。我们通过两个数据示例说明了可用方法的范围。第一个例子是在调整体重指数后对腰围臀围进行的调整,涉及对定量特征的统计调整。第二个例子是基于是否开始吸烟进行的分层分析。在这两种情况下,我们发现混杂偏差对主要关联结果的影响很小,但这可能会传播到进一步分析中,如多基因风险评分和孟德尔随机化。