223 Egremont Plain Road, P.O. Box 563, Great Barrington, MA 01230.
Psychoanal Q. 2022;91(1):63-88. doi: 10.1080/00332828.2022.2045850.
In this paper, the author describes a process, that emerged as he contemplated with his patients the continuation of work together in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such a renegotiation lends itself to the formation of , as described by Baranger and Baranger (1969); attention to these bastions demonstrates that the psychoanalytic process continues and can deepen. An extended clinical vignette is presented to illustrate. If a more broadly defined is considered, not only may the frame be used as a clinical tool in a more nuanced way, but in addition, aspects of the traditional may be seen to contribute to the formation of bastions that, unaddressed, could impede the analytic process.
在本文中,作者描述了一个过程,当他与患者一起思考如何在 COVID-19 大流行期间继续合作时,这个过程浮现出来。正如 Baranger 和 Baranger(1969)所描述的那样,这种重新协商有助于形成,关注这些堡垒表明精神分析过程在继续,并可以加深。本文提出了一个扩展的临床案例来说明这一点。如果考虑一个更广泛定义的,不仅框架可以更细致地用作临床工具,而且传统框架的某些方面可能被视为有助于形成堡垒,如果不加以解决,可能会阻碍分析过程。