• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

82例接受搏动性体外心室辅助装置支持的儿童分析:双心室循环与单心室循环患者的比较

Analysis of 82 Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison of Patients With Biventricular Versus Univentricular Circulation.

作者信息

Bleiweis Mark S, Stukov Yuriy, Philip Joseph, Peek Giles J, Pitkin Andrew D, Sullivan Kevin J, Neal Dan, Jacobs Jeffrey P

机构信息

Congenital Heart Center, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida..

Congenital Heart Center, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Summer;35(2):367-376. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 15.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.05.002
PMID:35584776
Abstract

We reviewed outcomes in 82 consecutive children supported with the Berlin Heart pulsatile ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with functionally univentricular circulation (n = 34) to those with biventricular circulation (n = 48). The primary outcome was mortality. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival. T-tests using KM-estimated survival proportions and standard errors were used to compare groups at specific time points. 48 biventricular patients were supported (Age: median = 1.4 years, range = 17 days-17.7 years; Weight [kilograms]: median = 9.4, range = 3.1-112), including 43 BiVAD, 4 LVAD only, and 1 LVAD converted to BiVAD. In biventricular patients, duration of VAD support [days]: median = 97, range = 4-315. Of 48 biventricular patients, 35 underwent heart transplantation, 7 died on VAD, 5 weaned off VAD (1 of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and 1 is still on VAD. 34 univentricular patients were supported with single VAD (sVAD) (Age: median = 38.5 days, range = 4 days-13.3 years; Weight [kilograms]: median = 3.98, range = 2.4-32.6). In univentricular patients, duration of VAD support [days]: median = 138, range = 4-554. Of 34 univentricular patients, 22 underwent transplantation, 11 died on VAD, and 1 is still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 82.7% (95% CI = 72.4-94.4%) in biventricular patients and 59.7% (95% CI = 44.9-79.5%) in univentricular patients, p = 0.026. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 79.7% (95% CI = 68.6-92.6%) in biventricular patients and 50.5% (95% CI = 35.0-73.0%) in univentricular patients, p = 0.010. Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge to transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with functionally univentricular circulation; however, survival is worse than in patients with biventricular circulation.

摘要

我们回顾了连续82例接受柏林心脏搏动性心室辅助装置(VAD)支持的儿童的治疗结果,将功能单心室循环患儿(n = 34)与双心室循环患儿(n = 48)进行比较。主要结局为死亡率。采用Kaplan-Meier(KM)方法和对数秩检验评估长期生存的组间差异。使用KM估计的生存比例和标准误进行t检验,以比较特定时间点的组间差异。48例双心室患儿接受了支持治疗(年龄:中位数 = 1.4岁,范围 = 17天至17.7岁;体重[千克]:中位数 = 9.4,范围 = 3.1至112),包括43例双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)、4例仅左心室辅助装置(LVAD)和1例从LVAD转换为BiVAD的患儿。在双心室患儿中,VAD支持时间[天]:中位数 = 97,范围 = 4至315。48例双心室患儿中,35例行心脏移植,7例在VAD支持下死亡,5例脱离VAD(其中1例在脱离VAD 334天后行心脏移植),1例仍在接受VAD支持。34例单心室患儿接受单VAD(sVAD)支持(年龄:中位数 = 38.5天,范围 = 4天至13.3岁;体重[千克]:中位数 = 3.98,范围 = 2.4至32.6)。在单心室患儿中,VAD支持时间[天]:中位数 = 138,范围 = 4至554。34例单心室患儿中,22例行移植,11例在VAD支持下死亡,1例仍在接受VAD支持。双心室患儿VAD植入后1年生存率为82.7%(95%CI = 72.4 - 94.4%),单心室患儿为59.7%(95%CI = 44.9 - 79.5%),p = 0.026。VAD植入后5年生存率,双心室患儿为79.7%(95%CI = 68.6 - 92.6%),单心室患儿为50.5%(95%CI = 35.0 - 73.0%),p = 0.010。搏动性VAD有助于功能单心室循环的新生儿、婴儿和儿童过渡到移植;然而,其生存率低于双心室循环患儿。

相似文献

1
Analysis of 82 Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison of Patients With Biventricular Versus Univentricular Circulation.82例接受搏动性体外心室辅助装置支持的儿童分析:双心室循环与单心室循环患者的比较
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Summer;35(2):367-376. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
A Single-Institutional Experience with 36 Children Smaller Than 5 Kilograms Supported with the Berlin Heart Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) over 12 Years: Comparison of Patients with Biventricular versus Functionally Univentricular Circulation.12 年间 36 名体重小于 5 公斤的儿童使用柏林心脏心室辅助装置(VAD)的单中心经验:双心室与功能性单心室循环患者的比较。
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2023 Mar;14(2):117-124. doi: 10.1177/21501351221146150. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Support with Single Ventricle-Ventricular Assist Device (sVAD) in Patients with Functionally Univentricular Circulation Prior to Fontan Operation.在 Fontan 手术前,对功能性单心室循环患者使用单心室-心室辅助装置(sVAD)进行支持。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2023;26:26-39. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
4
Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease.搏动性体外心室辅助装置支持的儿童的结局:先天性与获得性心脏病。
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2023 Nov;14(6):708-715. doi: 10.1177/21501351231181105. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Palliation Plus Ventricular Assist Device Insertion in 15 Neonates and Infants With Functionally Univentricular Circulation.15 例功能性单心室循环新生儿和婴儿行姑息性治疗加心室辅助装置植入术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct;114(4):1412-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.051. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Pediatric ventricular assist device therapy for advanced heart failure-Hong Kong experience.小儿晚期心力衰竭的心室辅助装置治疗——香港经验
J Artif Organs. 2020 Jun;23(2):133-139. doi: 10.1007/s10047-019-01140-4. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Ventricular assist device support in children and adolescents with heart failure: the Children's Medical Center of Dallas experience.心室辅助装置在心力衰竭儿童和青少年中的支持:达拉斯儿童医疗中心的经验。
Artif Organs. 2012 Jul;36(7):635-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01443.x. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
8
Successful Bridge-to-Transplant of Functionally Univentricular Patients With a Modified Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Device.使用改良型连续血流心室辅助装置成功实现功能性单心室患者的桥接至移植
Artif Organs. 2017 Jan;41(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/aor.12881.
9
The effect of paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist devices on allosensitization in adults: A comparison with left ventricular assist devices.体外搏动式双心室辅助装置对成人同种异体致敏的影响:与左心室辅助装置的比较。
Transpl Immunol. 2021 Dec;69:101477. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101477. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Concomitant pulsatile and continuous flow VAD in biventricular and univentricular physiology: a comparison study with a numerical model.双心室和单心室生理状态下的脉动流与连续流联合心室辅助装置:一项数值模型比较研究
Int J Artif Organs. 2017 Mar 16;40(2):74-81. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000562. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial recovery in children supported with a durable ventricular assist device-a systematic review.儿童持久型心室辅助装置支持下的心肌恢复:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Aug 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad263.
2
Reply: Rationale and outcomes of single ventricle-ventricular assist device (sVAD).回复:单心室心室辅助装置(sVAD)的原理及结果。
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Dec 20;18:110. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.12.004. eCollection 2023 Apr.