Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.
Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia Valencia, Spain.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Aug;20(4):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
Treatment paradigms for management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are evolving. We examined impact of surgical metastasectomy on survival across in mRCC stratified by risk-group.
Multicenter retrospective analysis from the Registry of Metastatic RCC database. The cohort was subdivided utilizing Motzer criteria (favorable-, intermediate-, high-risk). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM)/overall survival (OS); secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality (CSM)/cancer-specific survival (CSS). Impact of metastasectomy was analyzed via Cox-Regression analysis adjusting for potential prognostic variables and Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) within each risk-group.
Four hundred thirty-one patients (59 favorable-risk, 274 intermediate-risk, 98 high-risk; median follow-up 27.2 months) were analyzed. Metastasectomy was performed in 22 (37%), 66 (24%), and 32 (16%) of favorable-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (P = .012). Median number of metastases at diagnosis differed significantly (favorable-risk 2, intermediate-risk 3.4, high-risk 5.1, P < .001). On Cox-regression, high-risk (HR = 1.72, P = .002) was associated with worsened ACM, while metastasectomy was associated with improved ACM (HR = 0.56, P = .005). On KMA, median OS (months) was longer with metastasectomy in favorable- (92.7 vs. 25.8, P = .003) and intermediate-risk (26.3 vs. 20.1, P = .038), but not high-risk (P = .911) groups. Metastasectomy was associated with longer CSS in favorable- (76.1 vs. 32.8, P = .004) but not intermediate- (P = .06) and high-risk (P = .595) groups.
Metastasectomy was independently associated with improved ACM and CSM, as well as improved CSS and OS in favorable- and intermediate-risk mRCC patients. Metastasectomy may be considered as component of multimodal management strategy in favorable and intermediate-risk subgroups. In high-risk patients, metastasectomy should be deferred except in select circumstances.
转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗模式正在发展。我们研究了在根据风险组分层的 mRCC 中,手术转移灶切除术对生存的影响。
来自转移性 RCC 登记处数据库的多中心回顾性分析。该队列利用 Motzer 标准(低危、中危、高危)进行细分。主要结局是全因死亡率(ACM)/总生存期(OS);次要结局是癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)/癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。通过 Cox 回归分析调整潜在预后变量,并在每个风险组内进行 Kaplan-Meier 分析(KMA),分析转移灶切除术的影响。
分析了 431 名患者(59 名低危风险,274 名中危风险,98 名高危风险;中位随访 27.2 个月)。低危、中危和高危组分别有 22 例(37%)、66 例(24%)和 32 例(16%)接受了转移灶切除术(P =.012)。诊断时转移灶的中位数数量差异显著(低危风险 2,中危风险 3.4,高危风险 5.1,P <.001)。在 Cox 回归中,高危(HR = 1.72,P =.002)与 ACM 恶化相关,而转移灶切除术与 ACM 改善相关(HR = 0.56,P =.005)。在 KMA 中,低危(92.7 与 25.8,P =.003)和中危(26.3 与 20.1,P =.038)组中,接受转移灶切除术的中位 OS(月)更长,但高危组无差异(P =.911)。转移灶切除术与低危(76.1 与 32.8,P =.004)而非中危(P =.06)和高危(P =.595)组的 CSS 延长相关。
转移灶切除术与 ACM 和 CSM 的改善以及低危和中危 mRCC 患者的 CSS 和 OS 的改善独立相关。在低危和中危亚组中,转移灶切除术可作为多模式管理策略的一部分。在高危患者中,除非在特殊情况下,否则应推迟转移灶切除术。