Department of Neurology, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan Third People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523320 Guangdong Province, China.
Dis Markers. 2022 May 9;2022:3042105. doi: 10.1155/2022/3042105. eCollection 2022.
To analyze the difference of circulating lncRNA expression profile between the healthy control group and cerebral infarction (CI) patients and to study the epigenetic pathogenesis of CI. Forty patients with acute CI admitted to our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were selected as CI group, and 40 healthy people in physical examination center were selected as healthy group. In the CI group, blood samples were taken 5 mL at fasting in the morning (within 72 hours of CI), and the blood samples from healthy group were also taken 5 mL at fasting in the morning. The circulating lncRNA expression profile of serum sample was determined by high-throughput technique, and its difference was analyzed. Bioinformatics technology was used to explore its functional mechanism, and GO, KEGG analysis, and gene expression network were established for lncRNA with significant differences. Next, lnc-ZNF32-1 : 1 and lnc-PCGF5-2 : 1 were selected for further validation of serum lncRNA expression in ACI and NC groups, and ceRNA interaction network analysis, diagnostic specificity, and sensitivity of lnc-ZNF32-1 : 1 and lnc-PCGF5-2 : 1 were conducted. The results showed that compared with the healthy group, there were 512 known lncRNA expressed differentially in the serum of patients with CI, of which 371 were upregulated and 141 were downregulated, and 421 known mRNA expressed differentially, of which 245 were upregulated and 176 downregulated. The differentially expressed mRNA was mainly enriched in 53 gene functions, and the target gene was enriched in the pathways such as HTLV-I infection and pathways in cancer. In addition, the results explored that lnc-ZNF32-1 : 1 and lnc-PCGF5-2 : 1 have potential value for CI diagnosis. In conclusion, the expression profile of lncRNA in CI group was significantly different from that in healthy group, indicating that lncRNA might be closely related to the occurrence, development, and prognosis of CI.
分析健康对照组和脑梗死(CI)患者循环长链非编码 RNA 表达谱的差异,并研究 CI 的表观遗传发病机制。选取 2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月我院收治的 40 例急性 CI 患者为 CI 组,选取同期体检中心 40 例健康人作为健康组。CI 组于清晨空腹(CI 后 72 小时内)抽取 5ml 血样,健康组清晨空腹抽取 5ml 血样。采用高通量技术检测血清样本的循环长链非编码 RNA 表达谱,并分析其差异。采用生物信息学技术探索其功能机制,建立 lncRNA 差异表达的 GO、KEGG 分析和基因表达网络。然后,进一步验证 ACI 和 NC 组血清 lncRNA 的 lnc-ZNF32-1:1 和 lnc-PCGF5-2:1 的表达,进行 ceRNA 相互作用网络分析、lnc-ZNF32-1:1 和 lnc-PCGF5-2:1 的诊断特异性和敏感性。结果表明,与健康组相比,CI 患者血清中有 512 种已知 lncRNA 表达差异,其中 371 种上调,141 种下调,421 种已知 mRNA 表达差异,其中 245 种上调,176 种下调。差异表达的 mRNA 主要富集在 53 个基因功能中,靶基因富集在 HTLV-I 感染和癌症途径等通路中。此外,研究结果表明,lnc-ZNF32-1:1 和 lnc-PCGF5-2:1 对 CI 诊断具有潜在价值。总之,CI 组 lncRNA 的表达谱与健康组有显著差异,表明 lncRNA 可能与 CI 的发生、发展和预后密切相关。