Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei Universitygrid.15444.30, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0020722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00207-22. Epub 2022 May 19.
A rapid and sensitive diagnosis is crucial for the management of tuberculosis (TB). A simple and label-free approach via homobifunctional imidoesters with a microfluidic platform (SLIM) assay showed a higher sensitivity than the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB). Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the SLIM assay for oral swab samples from cases of suspected PTB. Patients with clinically suspected PTB were prospectively enrolled and oral swab samples were processed using the SLIM assay and the attending physicians were blinded to the results of the SLIM assay. TB cases were defined as those treated with anti-TB chemotherapy for at least 6 months at the discretion of the specialists based on their clinical features and conventional laboratory results, including the Xpert assay. A total of 272 patients (with TB, = 128 [47.1%]; without TB, = 144 [52.9%]; mean age, 59.8 years) were enrolled. Overall, the sensitivity of the oral swab-based SLIM assay (65.6%) was higher than that of the sputum-based Xpert assay (43.4%; = 0.001). Specifically, the SLIM oral swab assay showed a notably higher sensitivity in culture-negative TB cases compared with the Xpert assay (69.0% [95% CI: 49.2 to 84.7%] versus 7.4% [95% CI: 0.9 to 24.3%]; = 0.001). The specificity of the SLIM and the Xpert assays was 86.1% (95% CI: 79.3 to 91.3%) and 100% (95% CI: 97.2 to 100%), respectively. When only culture-confirmed cases were analyzed, the SLIM oral swab was comparable to sputum Xpert in sensitivity (64.7% versus 54.3%, = 0.26). The oral swab-based SLIM assay showed a superior sensitivity for TB diagnosis over the sputum-based Xpert assay, especially for culture-negative cases. The development of a rapid, accessible, and highly sensitive diagnostic tool is a major challenge in the control and management of tuberculosis. Gene-based diagnostics is recommended for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), but its sensitivity, such as Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert), drops in cases with a low bacterial load. It can only be applied to sputum samples, and it is quite difficult for some patients to produce an adequate amount of sputum. We evaluated the clinical validity of an oral swab-based microfluidic system, i.e., the SLIM assay. The SLIM assay showed a significantly higher sensitivity than the Xpert assay, especially in smear-negative TB cases. This non-sputum-based SLIM assay can be a useful diagnostic test by overcoming the limitations of conventional sputum-based tests in pulmonary TB.
快速、敏感的诊断对于结核病(TB)的管理至关重要。通过带有微流控平台(SLIM)检测的同双功能亚胺酯的简单、无标签方法显示,在诊断肺结核(PTB)方面,其灵敏度高于 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测。在这里,我们评估了 SLIM 检测法在疑似肺结核病例的口腔拭子样本中的疗效。前瞻性纳入了临床疑似肺结核的患者,并使用 SLIM 检测法处理口腔拭子样本,主治医生对 SLIM 检测法的结果不知情。结核病病例定义为根据其临床特征和常规实验室结果(包括 Xpert 检测),由专家酌情治疗至少 6 个月的抗结核化疗的患者。共纳入 272 例患者(结核病患者,=128[47.1%];非结核病患者,=144[52.9%];平均年龄,59.8 岁)。总体而言,基于口腔拭子的 SLIM 检测法(65.6%)的灵敏度高于基于痰液的 Xpert 检测法(43.4%;=0.001)。具体来说,SLIM 口腔拭子检测法在培养阴性的结核病病例中显示出明显更高的灵敏度,高于 Xpert 检测法(69.0%[95%CI:49.2 至 84.7%]与 7.4%[95%CI:0.9 至 24.3%];=0.001)。SLIM 和 Xpert 检测法的特异性分别为 86.1%(95%CI:79.3 至 91.3%)和 100%(95%CI:97.2 至 100%)。当仅分析培养确诊的病例时,SLIM 口腔拭子与痰液 Xpert 相比,灵敏度相当(64.7%比 54.3%,=0.26)。基于口腔拭子的 SLIM 检测法在结核病诊断方面的灵敏度优于基于痰液的 Xpert 检测法,特别是对于培养阴性的病例。快速、易于获得且高度敏感的诊断工具的开发是结核病控制和管理的主要挑战。基因诊断被推荐用于快速诊断肺结核(PTB),但 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测(Xpert)等方法的灵敏度会下降,例如在细菌载量较低的情况下。它只能应用于痰样本,并且对于一些患者来说,产生足够量的痰相当困难。我们评估了基于口腔拭子的微流控系统,即 SLIM 检测法的临床有效性。SLIM 检测法的灵敏度明显高于 Xpert 检测法,特别是在涂片阴性的结核病病例中。这种非痰基的 SLIM 检测法可以通过克服传统痰基检测在肺结核中的局限性成为一种有用的诊断测试。