• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of current status of quantitative detection of biomarkers for liver fibrosis in Clinical labs in China.中国临床实验室中肝纤维化生物标志物定量检测现状分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jul;36(7):e24490. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24490. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
[Diagnostic values of serum levels of HA, PC III, C IV and LN to the liver fibrosis in children with beta-thalassemia major].血清透明质酸、Ⅲ型前胶原、Ⅳ型胶原和层粘连蛋白水平对重型β地中海贫血患儿肝纤维化的诊断价值
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Aug;41(8):603-6.
3
Usefulness of collagen type IV in the detection of significant liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.IV 型胶原在非酒精性脂肪性肝病中检测显著肝纤维化的作用。
Ann Hepatol. 2021 Jan-Feb;20:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.08.070. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
Comparison of four markers of hepatic fibrosis and hepatic function indices in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatoma.肝硬化和肝癌患者肝纤维化四项指标与肝功能指标的比较
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):4108-4121. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1623. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
ROC curves in evaluation of serum fibrosis indices for hepatic fibrosis.用于评估肝纤维化的血清纤维化指标的ROC曲线
World J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;8(6):1073-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i6.1073.
6
[Value of simultaneous determination of serum hyaluronic acid, collagen type IV and the laminin level in diagnosing liver fibrosis].[血清透明质酸、IV型胶原和层粘连蛋白水平联合检测在肝纤维化诊断中的价值]
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2002 Feb 28;27(1):67-8.
7
Role of hyaluronic acid and laminin as serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.透明质酸和层粘连蛋白作为血清标志物预测慢性乙型肝炎患者显著纤维化的作用。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb;16(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s1413-8670(12)70267-2.
8
Value of MR diffusion imaging in hepatic fibrosis and its correlations with serum indices.磁共振扩散成像在肝纤维化中的价值及其与血清指标的相关性
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7964-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7964.
9
Liver Shear-Wave Velocity and Serum Fibrosis Markers to Diagnose Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Viral Hepatitis B.肝剪切波速度和血清纤维化标志物用于诊断慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者的肝纤维化
Korean J Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):396-404. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.396. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
[Diagnostic value of five serum markers for liver fibrosis].[五种血清标志物对肝纤维化的诊断价值]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2001 Jun;9(3):148-50.

引用本文的文献

1
New Biomarkers in Liver Fibrosis: A Pass through the Quicksand?肝纤维化中的新生物标志物:在流沙中穿行?
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 29;14(8):798. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080798.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression.肝纤维化及其逆转的分子和细胞机制。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;18(3):151-166. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00372-7. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Current and Future Clinical and Molecular Perspectives.无创性肝纤维化评估:当前和未来的临床与分子视角。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 11;21(14):4906. doi: 10.3390/ijms21144906.
3
Bile acids associate with specific gut microbiota, low-level alcohol consumption and liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.胆汁酸与非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的特定肠道微生物群、低水平饮酒及肝纤维化相关。
Liver Int. 2020 Jun;40(6):1356-1365. doi: 10.1111/liv.14453. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
Advances in non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis.肝纤维化无创评估的进展。
Gut. 2020 Jul;69(7):1343-1352. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317593. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its role in liver cancer.肝纤维化的机制及其在肝癌中的作用。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020 Jan;245(2):96-108. doi: 10.1177/1535370219898141. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: A Review.慢性乙型肝炎感染:综述。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1802-1813. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3795.
7
Markers of hepatic fibrosis.肝纤维化标志物。
Med Clin (Barc). 2018 Apr 23;150(8):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
Basement Membrane Type IV Collagen and Laminin: An Overview of Their Biology and Value as Fibrosis Biomarkers of Liver Disease.基底膜型 IV 胶原和层粘连蛋白:其生物学特性及作为肝脏疾病纤维化生物标志物的价值概述。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;300(8):1371-1390. doi: 10.1002/ar.23567. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference.在第一届欧洲临床实验室医学联合会(EFLM)战略会议中定义的,将实验室测量值分配至分析性能规范模型的标准。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Feb 1;55(2):189-194. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0091.
10
Overview of hepatitis B viral replication and genetic variability.乙型肝炎病毒复制与基因变异性概述。
J Hepatol. 2016 Apr;64(1 Suppl):S4-S16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.027.

中国临床实验室中肝纤维化生物标志物定量检测现状分析

Analysis of current status of quantitative detection of biomarkers for liver fibrosis in Clinical labs in China.

作者信息

Zhang Chao, Zhang Chuanbao

机构信息

National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jul;36(7):e24490. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24490. Epub 2022 May 19.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.24490
PMID:35587485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9279982/
Abstract

AIM

To explore the quality control and implementation of the quantitative detection of liver fibrosis biomarkers, laminin (LN), collagen IV (Col Ⅳ), procollagen III amino-terminal propeptide (PⅢNP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and cholyglycine (CG), in China.

METHODS

Two quality control products were measured in different laboratories using different measurement methods and reagents, and the acquired results were subjected to analysis. The quantitative detection technique was based on the conventional assessment criteria, with a target value ±30% being employed.

RESULTS

Hundred labs were involved in the External Quality Assessment with 88 laboratories completing the assessment, and the pass rates were 84%, 80.2%, 67.5%, 77.3%, and 58.3% for HA, LN, PⅢNP, Col Ⅳ, and CG, respectively. Chemiluminescence immunoassay was used most for HA (90.1%), LN (90.1%), PⅢNP (87.9%), and Col Ⅳ (82.9%) determination, whereas the chemiluminescence immunoassay (31.6%), latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry (36.7%), and homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (26.7%) were used for CG determination. The coefficients of variation for HA, LN, PⅢNP, Col Ⅳ, and CG in different laboratories were 3.3%-19.49%, 1.74%-38.81%, 1.97%-41.29%, 2.85%-41.69%, and 2.71%-41.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical quantitative detection of liver fibrosis biomarkers is highly performed in China. The existing problems are that there are many manufacturers producing reagents and instruments, the quality of reagents is uneven, the specificity and sensitivity of reagents are greatly different, the comparability of results of various systems is poor, and the accuracy and consistency between different systems are lacking. All above underscores the critical importance of EQA in improving and monitoring the identification of biomarkers for liver fibrosis.

摘要

目的

探讨我国肝纤维化生物标志物层粘连蛋白(LN)、Ⅳ型胶原(Col Ⅳ)、Ⅲ型前胶原氨基端前肽(PⅢNP)、透明质酸(HA)和甘氨胆酸(CG)定量检测的质量控制及实施情况。

方法

在不同实验室使用不同测量方法和试剂对两种质量控制品进行测量,并对所得结果进行分析。定量检测技术基于常规评估标准,采用目标值±30%。

结果

100家实验室参与了室间质量评价,88家实验室完成了评价,HA、LN、PⅢNP、Col Ⅳ和CG的合格率分别为84%、80.2%、67.5%、77.3%和58.3%。HA(90.1%)、LN(90.1%)、PⅢNP(87.9%)和Col Ⅳ(82.9%)测定大多采用化学发光免疫分析法,而CG测定采用化学发光免疫分析法(31.6%)、乳胶增强免疫比浊法(36.7%)和均相酶免疫分析法(26.7%)。不同实验室HA、LN、PⅢNP、Col Ⅳ和CG的变异系数分别为3.3% - 19.49%、1.74% - 38.81%、1.97% - 41.29%、2.85% - 41.69%和2.71% - 41.8%。

结论

我国肝纤维化生物标志物的临床定量检测水平较高。存在的问题是试剂和仪器生产厂家众多,试剂质量参差不齐,试剂特异性和灵敏度差异较大,各系统结果可比性差,不同系统间缺乏准确性和一致性。以上所有情况凸显了室间质量评价在改进和监测肝纤维化生物标志物鉴定方面的至关重要性。