Suppr超能文献

ALONE 量表的验证:孤独的临床测量工具。

Validation of the ALONE Scale: A Clinical Measure of Loneliness.

机构信息

Ekamjit Singh Deol, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA,

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(5):421-424. doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1794-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of a rapid, clinically administrable loneliness screening tool for older adults called the ALONE scale.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from either ambulatory clinics or a nursing home.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 65 years of age or older and had SLUMS scores of 14 or greater.

MEASUREMENTS

Construct validity of the 5-item ALONE scale was examined through correlation with the previously validated UCLA-20 Loneliness Questionnaire. Divergent validity for discriminating between loneliness and depression was examined through correlation with the PHQ-8 items. Test-retest reliability was assessed by correlation between baseline ALONE scores and those from re-administration in 2-3 weeks.

RESULTS

Among ambulatory clinic participants (n=199), the ALONE scale showed strong correlation with the UCLA-20 (r=0.81, p < 0.001). Similar correlation coefficients were seen among demographic subgroups: White Americans (n=123) (r=0.81, p < 0.001), Black Americans (n=66) (r=0.79, p < 0.001), adults ≥ 75 years (n=74) (r=0.86, p < 0.001). Among nursing home patients (n=22), the ALONE scale showed fair correlation with the UCLA-20 (r=0.74, p < 0.001). Test-retest of the ALONE scale showed a strong correlation (r=0.89, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis determined ALONE scale scores of 8 and greater as optimal for severe loneliness screening.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the ALONE scale has strong validity in assessing older adults for severe loneliness. The brief, comprehensible nature of the ALONE scale reduces adoption burden making it optimal for use in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验一种用于老年人的快速、临床可行的孤独筛查工具——ALONE 量表的有效性和可靠性。

设计

这是一项横断面研究。

地点

参与者从门诊诊所或疗养院招募。

参与者

参与者年龄在 65 岁及以上,SLUMS 评分在 14 分及以上。

测量

通过与先前验证的 UCLA-20 孤独问卷的相关性,检验 5 项 ALONE 量表的结构效度。通过与 PHQ-8 项的相关性,检验区分孤独和抑郁的差异效度。通过基线 ALONE 评分与 2-3 周后再测评分的相关性,评估测试-再测试的可靠性。

结果

在门诊诊所参与者中(n=199),ALONE 量表与 UCLA-20 量表呈高度相关(r=0.81,p<0.001)。在不同的人口统计学亚组中也观察到类似的相关系数:白种美国人(n=123)(r=0.81,p<0.001)、黑种美国人(n=66)(r=0.79,p<0.001)、≥75 岁的成年人(n=74)(r=0.86,p<0.001)。在疗养院患者中(n=22),ALONE 量表与 UCLA-20 量表呈中度相关(r=0.74,p<0.001)。ALONE 量表的测试-再测试呈高度相关(r=0.89,p<0.001)。ROC 曲线分析确定 ALONE 量表评分≥8 分是严重孤独筛查的最佳选择。

结论

本研究表明,ALONE 量表在评估老年人严重孤独方面具有较强的有效性。ALONE 量表的简洁、易懂的性质降低了采用的负担,使其成为临床环境中使用的理想选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e1c/9098380/fb38ea729e9f/12603_2022_1794_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验