Suppr超能文献

与静止光栅相比,动光栅训练可提高子午型弱视的视力。

Visual acuity increase in meridional amblyopia by exercises with moving gratings as compared to stationary gratings.

机构信息

Amblyocation GmbH, Dresden.

Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam.

出版信息

Strabismus. 2022 Jun;30(2):99-110. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2022.2062007.

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to investigate the effect of a novel therapy based on pleoptic exercises combined with standard occlusion in patients with meridional amblyopia. The exercising system itself, termed focal ambient visual acuity stimulation (FAVAS), consists of sinusoidally modulated circular gratings, which were implemented as a background pattern in computer games binding the children's attention. For the assessment of therapeutic effects, we tested for the development of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients trained with a gaming field background of moving gratings (Moving) compared to patients treated with stationary gratings (Stationary). Patients with amblyopia (caused by strabismus, refraction, or both) and astigmatism were randomly allocated to two groups, all of whom received a standard occlusion regimen. In combination with occlusion, using a crossover design, the first group (Moving-Stationary group) was alternately exercised for 10 days with a series of Moving followed by 10 days with Stationary and the second group (Stationary-Moving group) vice versa. The treatment-dependent training effect on BCVA was measured with respect to the alignment of the least vs. the most ametropic meridian in both groups. BCVA was examined using a meridionally direction-sensitive visual test inventory, and we estimated the monocular BCVA in all patients along four meridians: 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° before and after Moving as compared to Stationary treatments. The Moving-Stationary group consisted of 17 children (34 eyes) aged 10 to 13 (average 11.6 ± 0.3) years. The Stationary-Moving group consisted of 20 children (40 eyes) aged 9 to 14 (average 12.5 ± 0.4). In both groups, visual acuity increased significantly only with Moving combined with occlusion. Thereby, the visual acuity (logMAR) along different meridians showed a statistically significant improvement induced by Moving if testing was coincident with alignment of the directional optical characters close to the most ametropic meridian in the Moving-Stationary group (0.73 ± 0.32 to 0.41 ± 0.22,  < 0.01) and also in the Stationary-Moving group (0.48 ± 0.27 to 0.33 ± 0.18,  < 0.01). Significant improvement was also induced by Moving if tested in alignment with the perpendicular orientation close to the least ametropic meridian, although with a smaller amount, in the Moving-Stationary group (0.49 ± 0.23 to 0.37 ± 0.21,  < 0.01) as well as in the Stationary-Moving group (0.33 ± 0.18 to 0.28 ± 0.16,  < 0.01). After Stationary combined with occlusion, however, there was no statistically significant improvement, regardless of the meridian. Visual training of patients with meridional amblyopia by a series of online exercises using attention-binding computer games which contained moving gratings as a background stimulus (Moving) resulted in a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity in the most refractive meridian, and to a lesser extent, in the least refractive meridian. No statistically significant improvement was achieved after the respective exercising series in the sham condition with stationary gratings (Stationary).

摘要

本研究旨在探究一种基于 pleoptic 运动联合常规遮盖治疗子午向弱视患者的疗效。该运动系统称为焦点环境视觉刺激(FAVAS),由正弦调制的圆形光栅组成,在电脑游戏中作为背景图案实现,以吸引患儿的注意力。为了评估治疗效果,我们测试了接受移动光栅(移动)游戏背景训练的患者和接受静止光栅(静止)治疗的患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的发展情况。患有弱视(由斜视、屈光不正或两者共同引起)和散光的患者被随机分配到两组,所有患者均接受标准遮盖治疗。结合遮盖,使用交叉设计,第一组(移动-静止组)交替进行为期 10 天的移动治疗,然后进行 10 天的静止治疗,第二组(静止-移动组)反之。在两组中,根据最少和最多离焦子午线的对齐情况,测量 BCVA 的治疗依赖性训练效果。使用方向敏感的子午线视觉测试库检查 BCVA,我们在所有患者的四个子午线(0°、45°、90°和 135°)中估计了单眼 BCVA,比较了移动治疗和静止治疗前后的数据。移动-静止组由 17 名 10 至 13 岁(平均 11.6±0.3 岁)的儿童(34 只眼)组成。静止-移动组由 20 名 9 至 14 岁(平均 12.5±0.4 岁)的儿童(40 只眼)组成。在两组中,仅在移动治疗联合遮盖治疗时,BCVA 显著增加。因此,不同子午线的视力(logMAR)显示,如果测试与沿最离焦子午线方向的定向光学特征对齐,移动治疗会显著改善移动-静止组(0.73±0.32 至 0.41±0.22,<0.01)和静止-移动组(0.48±0.27 至 0.33±0.18,<0.01);如果与沿最接近最小离焦子午线的垂直方向对齐,也会显著改善,尽管量较小,移动-静止组(0.49±0.23 至 0.37±0.21,<0.01)和静止-移动组(0.33±0.18 至 0.28±0.16,<0.01)。然而,在静止治疗联合遮盖治疗后,无论子午线如何,均无统计学意义上的改善。使用包含移动光栅作为背景刺激的注意力绑定电脑游戏进行一系列在线运动训练,可以改善子午向弱视患者的视力,在最屈光不正的子午线方向效果更明显,在最不屈光不正的子午线方向效果略差。在静止光栅(静止)的假治疗系列中,没有观察到统计学意义上的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验