Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Nam-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Nam-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Aug;43(8):1084-1091. doi: 10.1177/10711007221092761. Epub 2022 May 19.
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the conventional delayed and staged approaches for intra-articular calcaneus fractures in which early definite fixation could not be performed because of severe soft tissue injury.
From January 2015 to May 2019, a total of 32 cases with acute intra-articular calcaneal fractures met criteria and were enrolled in the study. We compared the outcomes of intra-articular calcaneal fractures that underwent delayed internal fixation between groups treated with a conventional delayed approach (non-EF group) vs a temporary medial external fixation (EF group). Clinical outcome measures included a 10-point visual analog scale score, the AOFAS score, and the Foot Function Index. Radiographic outcome measures included Böhler angle, talar declination angle, and calcaneal width. Reduction of the posterior facet was assessed on CT scans.
The first 15 (46.9%) were treated with a conventional delayed approach, and the latter 17 (53.1%) were treated with a staged approach with temporary medial external fixation. Clinical outcomes were not different between the groups at the last follow-up. The time from injury to definite internal fixation was shorter by an average of 3.8 days in the EF group ( = .001). The Böhler angle, talar declination angle, and calcaneal width were not different between the groups before surgery and at the last follow-up. Reduction of the posterior facet on CT scans was significantly better in the EF group than in the non-EF group (good/excellent = 94% vs 60%, respectively, = .033).
The staged approach using medial external fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures could be an effective method to decrease the time to definitive internal fixation and obtain optimal reduction of the posterior facet.
Level III, retrospective case-control study.
比较因严重软组织损伤而无法早期行确定性固定的关节内跟骨骨折的传统延迟分期与分期治疗方法的临床和影像学结果。
2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月,共有 32 例符合标准的急性关节内跟骨骨折患者纳入研究。我们比较了采用传统延迟内固定治疗的关节内跟骨骨折患者(非 EF 组)与采用临时内侧外固定(EF 组)治疗的患者的结果。临床结果评估指标包括 10 分视觉模拟评分、AOFAS 评分和足部功能指数。影像学结果评估指标包括 Böhler 角、距骨倾斜角和跟骨宽度。通过 CT 扫描评估后关节面的复位情况。
前 15 例(46.9%)采用传统延迟治疗,后 17 例(53.1%)采用临时内侧外固定分期治疗。末次随访时,两组患者的临床结果无差异。EF 组的确定性内固定时间平均缩短 3.8 天( =.001)。术前和末次随访时,两组的 Böhler 角、距骨倾斜角和跟骨宽度均无差异。CT 扫描显示 EF 组后关节面复位明显优于非 EF 组(优/良=94%比 60%, =.033)。
对于移位的关节内跟骨骨折,采用内侧外固定的分期治疗方法可有效缩短确定性内固定时间,并获得后关节面的最佳复位。
III 级,回顾性病例对照研究。