Suppr超能文献

[通过计算机分析和常规定量方法获得的肌电图描记图的比较]

[Comparison of EMG tracings obtained by means of computer analysis and by routine quantitative method].

作者信息

Szmidt-Sałkowska E, Kopeć J

出版信息

Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1978 May-Jun;12(3):281-6.

PMID:355908
Abstract

The purpose of the present work was to compare EMG tracings obtained by the automatic method using the computer ANOPS and by the method of quantitative electromyography. The measurements of the automatic method were found to be reliable and reproducible permitting to distinguish normal from pathological tracing, and in the pathological tracing to discriminate between the so called primary muscular and the neurogenic changes. The automatic method permits a much larger number of potentials to be evaluated, besides it is less time consuming and more objective since it rules out subjective selection of potentials which is a drawback in the conventional method.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用计算机ANOPS的自动方法和定量肌电图方法获得的肌电图描记图。结果发现,自动方法的测量结果可靠且可重复,能够区分正常和病理描记图,并且在病理描记图中能够区分所谓的原发性肌肉变化和神经源性变化。自动方法允许评估更多数量的电位,此外,它耗时更少且更客观,因为它排除了传统方法中电位主观选择这一缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验