Suppr超能文献

[通过计算机分析和常规定量方法获得的肌电图描记图的比较]

[Comparison of EMG tracings obtained by means of computer analysis and by routine quantitative method].

作者信息

Szmidt-Sałkowska E, Kopeć J

出版信息

Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1978 May-Jun;12(3):281-6.

PMID:355908
Abstract

The purpose of the present work was to compare EMG tracings obtained by the automatic method using the computer ANOPS and by the method of quantitative electromyography. The measurements of the automatic method were found to be reliable and reproducible permitting to distinguish normal from pathological tracing, and in the pathological tracing to discriminate between the so called primary muscular and the neurogenic changes. The automatic method permits a much larger number of potentials to be evaluated, besides it is less time consuming and more objective since it rules out subjective selection of potentials which is a drawback in the conventional method.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用计算机ANOPS的自动方法和定量肌电图方法获得的肌电图描记图。结果发现,自动方法的测量结果可靠且可重复,能够区分正常和病理描记图,并且在病理描记图中能够区分所谓的原发性肌肉变化和神经源性变化。自动方法允许评估更多数量的电位,此外,它耗时更少且更客观,因为它排除了传统方法中电位主观选择这一缺点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验