Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas - School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Prisma Health, Gastroenterology & Liver Center, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;56(1):41-55. doi: 10.1111/apt.16965. Epub 2022 May 19.
Previous studies in upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding have reported inconsistent outcomes about packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion practices.
To assess whether PRBC transfusion is more likely to be dangerous in variceal bleeding than in non-variceal bleeding due to concern of over-transfusion leading to elevated portal pressure.
We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1999-2018). We identified patients with upper GI bleeding using an algorithmic approach, categorising bleeding from non-variceal or variceal sources. Our primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality. To control for the severity of bleeding, we performed propensity matching of baseline features, including age, gender, the presence of shock, the need for ICU care and co-morbidities. We also examined PRBC transfusion, inpatient mortality and hospitalisation rates for both populations.
We included 10,228,524 upper GI bleeding discharges; 755,135 patients had variceal bleeding. After propensity matching, PRBC transfusion in variceal bleeders was associated with a 22% increase in inpatient mortality, whereas non-variceal bleeders had a 9% increase in inpatient mortality. Compared to non-variceal bleeders receiving blood transfusion, variceal bleeders had nearly four-fold higher odds of inpatient mortality (propensity-matched OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 3.7-3.8; p < 0.001). Notably, PRBC transfusion rates in both groups have declined since 2011, although it has remained higher in variceal bleeders. Mortality for upper GI bleeding has been declining since 1999.
Although decreased over the last decade, PRBC transfusion rates remain high for variceal bleeders. In addition, PRBC transfusion appears to be more detrimental in variceal bleeders than in non-variceal bleeders.
先前关于上消化道(GI)出血的研究报告了关于浓缩红细胞(PRBC)输血实践的不一致结果。
评估由于担心过度输血导致门静脉压升高,PRBC 输血在静脉曲张出血中是否比非静脉曲张出血更危险。
我们使用了全国住院患者样本(1999-2018 年)。我们使用算法方法确定了上消化道出血患者,将出血分为非静脉曲张或静脉曲张来源。我们的主要结局是全因住院患者死亡率。为了控制出血的严重程度,我们对基线特征(包括年龄、性别、休克的存在、需要 ICU 护理和合并症)进行了倾向匹配。我们还检查了这两个人群的 PRBC 输血、住院患者死亡率和住院率。
我们纳入了 10228524 例上消化道出血出院患者;755135 例患者有静脉曲张出血。在倾向匹配后,静脉曲张出血者的 PRBC 输血与住院患者死亡率增加 22%相关,而非静脉曲张出血者的住院患者死亡率增加 9%。与接受输血的非静脉曲张出血者相比,静脉曲张出血者的住院患者死亡率高出近四倍(倾向匹配 OR:3.8;95%CI:3.7-3.8;p<0.001)。值得注意的是,自 2011 年以来,两组的 PRBC 输血率都有所下降,尽管在静脉曲张出血者中仍然较高。自 1999 年以来,上消化道出血的死亡率一直在下降。
尽管在过去十年中有所下降,但 PRBC 输血率在静脉曲张出血者中仍然较高。此外,PRBC 输血似乎对静脉曲张出血者的危害大于非静脉曲张出血者。