• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

层状节理岩层中隧道松动区的分类及松动压力估算

Classification of the loosening zones and estimation of the loosening pressures of tunnels in layered jointed rock strata.

作者信息

Wang Zhiwei, Ma Weibin

机构信息

Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2022 Apr-Jun;105(2):368504221098886. doi: 10.1177/00368504221098886.

DOI:10.1177/00368504221098886
PMID:35593138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450484/
Abstract

Due to the complexity of tunnels, accurate prediction of their loosening pressures in layered jointed rock strata is a very difficult engineering task. To recognize loosening patterns and estimate loosening pressures, numerical tests were employed in areas where tunnels were excavated in layered jointed rock strata. A total of 12 influential factors, including joints, tunnel depth, and strata, were considered in each of the numerical models. Three loosening patterns were found in the numerical testing: a ringent trumpet-shaped boundary, an arch-shaped boundary, and a closing-trend trumpet-shaped loosening zone. Empirical expressions for the loosening zone boundaries were further established and, in the form of the 12 influential factors, considered in the simulation. Given the boundary function, the loosening pressures were further deduced, which were categorized according to loosening pattern, i.e., ringent trumpet shape or arch shape, and the excavation condition of whether or not the embedded depth was deeper than the soft layer. Two case studies were used to test this method. The newly-proposed method was found to perform better than existing methods, with loosening pressure values that were slightly larger than, but very close to, actual measured field data.

摘要

由于隧道的复杂性,在层状节理岩层中准确预测其松动压力是一项非常困难的工程任务。为了识别松动模式并估算松动压力,在层状节理岩层中开挖隧道的区域进行了数值试验。每个数值模型中总共考虑了12个影响因素,包括节理、隧道深度和地层。在数值试验中发现了三种松动模式:张开的喇叭形边界、拱形边界和呈闭合趋势的喇叭形松动区。进一步建立了松动区边界的经验表达式,并以12个影响因素的形式在模拟中加以考虑。根据边界函数,进一步推导了松动压力,并根据松动模式(即张开的喇叭形或拱形)以及埋深是否大于软层的开挖条件进行了分类。通过两个案例研究对该方法进行了检验。结果发现,新提出的方法比现有方法表现更好,其松动压力值略大于实际现场测量数据,但非常接近。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/94adfc3e5d47/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/81702ba4ddfe/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/b47e50c7e508/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/08bc6a17c054/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/db1d1441bff4/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/38c9f3bda0a1/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/7882c1e5a6c6/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/67468d2c6a4f/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/895d302c833b/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/258ba3658581/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/d886f992db15/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/8dbcb7f48af1/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/317eafbf58a7/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/3d468dcbb630/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/9ad3f9d0c574/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/8d4cfd4e1bc8/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/ae6b3e66513c/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/0c996e59bb05/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/7b8620d91304/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/94adfc3e5d47/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/81702ba4ddfe/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/b47e50c7e508/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/08bc6a17c054/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/db1d1441bff4/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/38c9f3bda0a1/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/7882c1e5a6c6/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/67468d2c6a4f/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/895d302c833b/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/258ba3658581/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/d886f992db15/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/8dbcb7f48af1/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/317eafbf58a7/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/3d468dcbb630/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/9ad3f9d0c574/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/8d4cfd4e1bc8/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/ae6b3e66513c/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/0c996e59bb05/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/7b8620d91304/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d51/10450484/94adfc3e5d47/10.1177_00368504221098886-fig19.jpg

相似文献

1
Classification of the loosening zones and estimation of the loosening pressures of tunnels in layered jointed rock strata.层状节理岩层中隧道松动区的分类及松动压力估算
Sci Prog. 2022 Apr-Jun;105(2):368504221098886. doi: 10.1177/00368504221098886.
2
Influence of Section Shape and Buried Depth on Rock Loosening Zone around Underground Roadway in Coal Mine.断面形状与埋深对煤矿井下巷道围岩松动圈的影响
ACS Omega. 2022 Sep 14;7(38):34296-34308. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03811. eCollection 2022 Sep 27.
3
Stability Analysis and Control Methods of a Layered Roof of Gob-Side Entry in Inclined Rock Strata.倾斜岩层沿空巷道层状顶板稳定性分析与控制方法
ACS Omega. 2023 Sep 15;8(38):34534-34548. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03300. eCollection 2023 Sep 26.
4
A novel method to calculate pressure on the twin-tunnel in layered strata.
MethodsX. 2020 Nov 6;7:101126. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101126. eCollection 2020.
5
High-resolution delineation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in a dipping, fractured mudstone: Depth- and strata-dependent spatial variability from rock-core sampling.浸渍、裂隙泥岩中氯化挥发性有机化合物的高分辨率描绘:岩芯采样的深度和地层依赖性空间变异性
J Contam Hydrol. 2014 Dec 15;171:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
6
Experimental research on deformation failure process of roadway tunnel in fractured rock mass induced by mining excavation.采动诱发裂隙岩体巷道变形破坏过程试验研究
Environ Earth Sci. 2022;81(8):243. doi: 10.1007/s12665-022-10364-2. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Estimation of thermal hazards in surrounding rock of subway tunnel under dual periodic temperature boundaries: a case study.双周期温度边界下地铁隧道围岩热危害估计:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):67063-67075. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20370-3. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Assessing Mechanical Properties and Response of Expansive Soft Rock in Tunnel Excavation: A Numerical Simulation Study.隧道开挖中膨胀性软岩力学特性及响应评估:数值模拟研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;17(8):1747. doi: 10.3390/ma17081747.
9
Numerical investigation of water inflow and seepage characteristics in a tunnel crossing two overlapped parallel faults.穿越两条重叠平行断层的隧道涌水及渗流特性数值研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 21;13(1):11806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38986-x.
10
Excavation method optimization and mechanical responses investigating of a shallow buried super large section tunnels: a case study in Zhejiang.浅埋超大断面隧道开挖方法优化及力学响应研究:以浙江为例
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56982-7.