School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, USA.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Nov 2;39(11):2446-2453. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2078753. Epub 2022 May 20.
Little evidence is available to guide physical therapy (PT) following lower extremity fracture repair distal to the hip. As such, variability has been reported in the way PT is utilized post-operatively. Examination of current practice by orthopedic surgeons (OS) and physical therapists is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines in this area.
To describe current PT referral practices among OS, identify patient and clinical factors that affect PT referral, and examine differences between OS and physical therapists with regard to visit frequency, duration, and use of specific PT interventions.
Provider surveys.
Surveys were completed by 100 OS and 347 physical therapists. Over half (54%) of OS reported referring "most patients" to PT and identified joint stiffness and strength limitations as top reasons for PT referral. Over 80% of OS and physical therapists indicated that joint stiffness, strength limitations, and patients' functional goals affected their recommendations for PT visit frequency. More physical therapists than OS reported that pain severity (55% vs 25%, p < .001), maladaptive pain behaviors (64% vs. 33%, p < .001), and patient self-efficacy (70% vs. 49%, p = .003) affected their visit frequency recommendations. While OS recommended more frequent PT for patients with peri-articular fractures, fracture type had minimal impact on the visit frequencies recommended by physical therapists.
OS and physical therapists consider similar physical impairments when determining the need for PT and visit frequencies, however, physical therapists consider pain and psychosocial factors more often, with OS focusing more on injury type.
下肢髋关节以下骨折修复后,指导物理治疗(PT)的证据很少。因此,术后 PT 的应用方式存在差异。需要对骨科医生(OS)和物理治疗师目前的实践进行检查,以便为该领域的临床实践指南提供信息。
描述 OS 目前的 PT 转诊实践,确定影响 PT 转诊的患者和临床因素,并检查 OS 和物理治疗师在就诊频率、持续时间和使用特定 PT 干预措施方面的差异。
提供者调查。
完成了 100 名 OS 和 347 名物理治疗师的调查。超过一半(54%)的 OS 报告将“大多数患者”转诊给 PT,并将关节僵硬和力量限制列为转诊的主要原因。超过 80%的 OS 和物理治疗师表示,关节僵硬、力量限制和患者的功能目标影响他们对 PT 就诊频率的建议。与 OS 相比,更多的物理治疗师报告疼痛严重程度(55%比 25%,p < 0.001)、适应性疼痛行为(64%比 33%,p < 0.001)和患者自我效能(70%比 49%,p = 0.003)影响他们的就诊频率建议。虽然 OS 建议关节周围骨折患者更频繁地接受 PT,但骨折类型对物理治疗师推荐的就诊频率影响不大。
OS 和物理治疗师在确定是否需要 PT 和就诊频率时考虑相似的身体障碍,但物理治疗师更经常考虑疼痛和心理社会因素,而 OS 更关注损伤类型。