Suppr超能文献

紫杉醇涂层器械在治疗外周动脉疾病中的应用与死亡率或截肢率的增加无关。

The Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease is Not Associated With Increased Mortality or Amputations.

机构信息

Department of Endovascular & Vascular Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

Department of Endovascular & Vascular Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.047. Epub 2022 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strategies for the most effective treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remain controversial among clinicians. Several trials have shown improved primary patency of femoropopliteal interventions with the utilization of paclitaxel-coated balloons or stents compared to conventional balloons or stents. However, a 2018 meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for patients receiving drug-coated balloons or stents (DCBS), resulting in an international pause in the use of DCBS. A 2021 meta-analysis by the same group suggested an increased risk of major amputation following DCBS use in peripheral arterial revascularization procedures. Here we report our long-term institutional outcomes comparing uncoated devices to DCBS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent peripheral arterial angioplasty, stenting, atherectomy, or a combination between 2011 and 2020 within a regional healthcare system was performed. Univariate, multivariate, and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods to assess the primary end points of overall survival, 5-year survival, and amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 2,717 patients were identified, of whom 1,965 were treated with conventional uncoated devices and 752 were treated with DCBS. A univariate analysis showed that patients treated with non-DCBS had higher rates of overall mortality, major amputations, and mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. A multivariable analysis demonstrated that the use of conventional devices, age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, warfarin use, and atrial fibrillation all significantly increased the risk of 5-year mortality, overall mortality, and combined mortality and/or amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

DCBS are not associated with increased mortality or worse amputation-free survival in this real-world cohort of patients treated for PAD. Our data suggest that mortality is more closely linked with pre-existing patient comorbidities rather than device selection at the time of revascularization.

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病(PAD)的最有效治疗策略在临床医生中仍存在争议。几项试验表明,与传统球囊或支架相比,使用紫杉醇涂层球囊或支架可提高股腘介入的原发性通畅率。然而,2018 年的一项荟萃分析表明,接受药物涂层球囊或支架(DCBS)治疗的患者死亡率风险增加,导致国际上暂停使用 DCBS。同一组 2021 年的一项荟萃分析表明,在周围动脉血运重建手术中使用 DCBS 后,主要截肢的风险增加。在这里,我们报告我们的长期机构结果,比较了未涂层设备与 DCBS。

方法

对 2011 年至 2020 年期间在一个区域医疗保健系统内接受外周动脉血管成形术、支架置入术、旋切术或两者联合治疗的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。使用标准统计方法进行单变量、多变量和生存分析,以评估总生存、5 年生存和无截肢生存的主要终点。

结果

共确定了 2717 例患者,其中 1965 例接受常规未涂层器械治疗,752 例接受 DCBS 治疗。单变量分析显示,未接受 DCBS 治疗的患者总死亡率、主要截肢率以及 1、3 和 5 年死亡率较高。多变量分析表明,使用常规器械、年龄、糖尿病、慢性肾脏病、心肌梗死、短暂性脑缺血发作、华法林使用和心房颤动均显著增加 5 年死亡率、总死亡率和死亡率合并/或截肢的风险。

结论

在接受 PAD 治疗的这一真实世界患者队列中,DCBS 与死亡率增加或无截肢生存恶化无关。我们的数据表明,死亡率与再血管化时的患者合并症密切相关,而不是与设备选择有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验