Plassman B L, Lansing R W, Foti K
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jan;57(1):274-88. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.1.274.
Respiratory muscle responses to sudden obstruction of learned breathing movements were studied in seven normal adults. Subjects were trained to inspire at a constant rate (0.4 liters/s), or maintain a static inspiratory effort(-10 cmH2O). On each trial these efforts were loaded unpredictably by occluding the airway or applying an opposing negative pressure at the mouth. Surface EMGs were recorded from the neck, parasternal intercostal, pectoral, diaphragmatic, and abdominal muscles. The latency and pattern of the responses to occlusion or to negative pressure were obtained from 10-trial computer-averaged records. When subjects were trained to relax in response to loading, inhibitory responses (mean latency: 32 ms) were recorded from the neck (16 out of 21 10-trial averages), diaphragm (9 out of 21), and parasternal (3 out of 21) locations. Excitatory responses (mean latency: 69 ms) were also recorded from the neck (11 out of 21 10-trial averages), diaphragm (8 out of 21), and parasternal (1 out of 21) sites. These responses were also observed in many single trial records. When subjects were trained to make an additional inspiratory effort as quickly as possible after loading, the reaction was a high-amplitude EMG burst, sometimes preceded by a brief inhibitory response. The mean reaction times for the large bursts were: 70 ms for the neck, 86 ms for the diaphragm, and 91 ms for the parasternal intercostals. Latencies in the 60- to 70-ms range were found on many 10-trial averages. Because the latencies of the excitatory responses evoked when subjects were trained to relax in response to loading were similar to those of the EMG bursts recorded when subjects were trained to react quickly in response to loading, it is not possible to distinguish long-latency reflex and learned response components on the basis of latency alone. Previous work, which has assumed that responses in the 50- to 70-ms latency range must be reflexive rather than learned, may need to be reexamined.
在7名正常成年人中研究了呼吸肌对习得性呼吸运动突然受阻的反应。受试者被训练以恒定速率(0.4升/秒)吸气,或维持静态吸气努力(-10厘米水柱)。在每次试验中,通过阻塞气道或在口腔施加相反的负压来不可预测地增加这些努力。从颈部、胸骨旁肋间肌、胸肌、膈肌和腹肌记录表面肌电图。对阻塞或负压的反应潜伏期和模式是从10次试验的计算机平均记录中获得的。当受试者被训练对负荷做出放松反应时,在颈部(21个10次试验平均值中有16个)、膈肌(21个中有9个)和胸骨旁(21个中有3个)部位记录到抑制性反应(平均潜伏期:32毫秒)。在颈部(21个10次试验平均值中有11个)、膈肌(21个中有8个)和胸骨旁(21个中有1个)部位也记录到兴奋性反应(平均潜伏期:69毫秒)。这些反应在许多单次试验记录中也有观察到。当受试者被训练在负荷后尽快做出额外的吸气努力时,反应是高幅度的肌电图爆发,有时之前会有短暂的抑制性反应。大爆发的平均反应时间为:颈部70毫秒,膈肌86毫秒,胸骨旁肋间肌91毫秒。在许多10次试验平均值中发现潜伏期在60至70毫秒范围内。因为当受试者被训练对负荷做出放松反应时诱发的兴奋性反应潜伏期与当受试者被训练对负荷快速做出反应时记录的肌电图爆发潜伏期相似,所以仅根据潜伏期不可能区分长潜伏期反射和习得性反应成分。以前的工作假设潜伏期在50至70毫秒范围内的反应一定是反射性的而不是习得性的,可能需要重新审视。