Changes in external ear position modify the spatial tuning of auditory units in the cat's superior colliculus.

This study examines the influence of external ear position on the auditory spatial tuning of single units in the superior colliculus of the anesthetized cat. Unit responses to broad-band stimuli presented in a free sound field were measured with the external ears in a forward symmetrical position or with one or the other ear turned 40 degrees to the side; the ears are referred to as contra- or ipsilateral with respect to the side of the recording site. Changes in the position of either ear modified the spatial tuning of units. The region of space from which a stimulus was most effective in activating a unit is referred to as the unit's "best area". Whenever the contralateral ear was turned to the side, best areas shifted peripherally and somewhat upward, roughly in proportion to the magnitude of the change in ear position. A turn of the ipsilateral ear to the side had more variable effects, but best areas generally shifted frontally. Best areas located between approximately 10 and 40 degrees contralateral when the ears were forward were least affected by changes in ipsilateral ear position. Changes in ear position also modified the maximum response rates of many units. Units with best areas located within approximately 20 degrees of the frontal midline when the ears were forward exhibited a pronounced decrease in responsiveness when either ear was turned. Units with more peripheral best areas tended to show no change or a slight increase in responsiveness. The influence of ear position on the directionality of the external ears was determined by mapping the cochlear microphonic response to tones or one-third-octave bands of noise before and after turning the ear. When the ears were forward, maximum interaural intensity differences (IIDs) were produced by high-frequency sound sources (greater than or equal to 20 kHz) located 20-40 degrees from the frontal midline and by lower frequency sources located further peripherally. The influence of ear position on the locations from which maximum IIDs were produced was similar to the influence of ear position on unit best areas. Changes in ipsilateral ear position had different effects on high- and low-frequency IIDs that were comparable with the effects of changes in ear position on frontally and peripherally located best areas, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)