From the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto (B.R.M., A.B., D.T.W., A.B., R.H.M.), Toronto, Ontario.
From the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto (B.R.M., A.B., D.T.W., A.B., R.H.M.), Toronto, Ontario; Department of Ophthalmology, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto (D.T.W., A.B., R.H.M.), Toronto, Ontario.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;241:227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 18.
To compare visual acuity and photoreceptor integrity following pars plana vitrectomy with drainage from the peripheral retinal break(s) (PRB), posterior retinotomy (PR), or perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Retrospective consecutive interventional comparative clinical study.
300 consecutive patients (300 eyes) with primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment underwent 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal fluid drainage through PRB (n = 100), PR (n = 100), or with PFCL (n = 100). Visual acuity and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were visual acuity and discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, interdigitation zone, and retinal pigment epithelium at 1 year.
Baseline characteristics were similar. Single-operation reattachment rates were as follows: PRB 86%, PR 85%, and PFCL 83% (P = .9). Mean (±SD) logMAR visual acuity at 1 year was greater with PRB and PR compared with PFCL (PRB 0.6 ± 0.5, PR 0.7 ± 0.6, PFCL 0.9 ± 0.6, P = .002). There was an association between drainage technique and discontinuity of the external limiting membrane (PRB 26%, PR 24%, PFCL 44%, P = .001), ellipsoid zone (PRB 29%, PR 31%, PFCL 49%, P < .001), and interdigitation zone (PRB 43%, PR 39%, PFCL 56%, P = .004). There was an association between drainage technique and risk of cystoid macular edema (PRB 28%, PR 39%, PFCL 46%, P = .003) and epiretinal membrane (PRB 64%, PR 90%, PFCL 61%, P < .001).
PFCL-assisted drainage is associated with worse visual acuity and greater risk of outer retinal band discontinuity and cystoid macular edema compared with PRB or PR. PR had a greater risk of epiretinal membrane compared with PRB and PFCL. PRB had the best outcomes overall. Drainage technique may impact long-term anatomic and functional outcomes.
比较经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术联合视网膜裂孔(PRB)、后视网膜切开术(PR)或全氟碳液体(PFCL)引流治疗孔源性视网膜脱离伴黄斑脱离的视力和光感受器完整性。
回顾性连续干预性临床研究。
300 例(300 眼)原发性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离患者行 23G 经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术联合视网膜下液引流治疗,其中 PRB 引流 100 眼,PR 引流 100 眼,PFCL 引流 100 眼。术前及术后 3、6、12 个月行视力和频域光相干断层扫描检查。主要结局为术后 1 年时视力和外界膜、椭圆体带、内网状层和视网膜色素上皮的连续性。
基线特征相似。单次手术复位率分别为 PRB 86%、PR 85%和 PFCL 83%(P=0.9)。术后 1 年平均(±SD)logMAR 视力以 PRB 和 PR 优于 PFCL(PRB 0.6±0.5,PR 0.7±0.6,PFCL 0.9±0.6,P=0.002)。引流技术与外界膜连续性(PRB 26%,PR 24%,PFCL 44%,P=0.001)、椭圆体带(PRB 29%,PR 31%,PFCL 49%,P<0.001)和内网状层连续性(PRB 43%,PR 39%,PFCL 56%,P=0.004)相关。引流技术与囊样黄斑水肿(PRB 28%,PR 39%,PFCL 46%,P=0.003)和视网膜内膜(PRB 64%,PR 90%,PFCL 61%,P<0.001)的发生风险相关。
与 PRB 或 PR 相比,PFCL 辅助引流与较差的视力和更大的外视网膜带不连续性及囊样黄斑水肿风险相关。与 PRB 和 PFCL 相比,PR 发生视网膜内膜的风险更大。PRB 总体预后最佳。引流技术可能影响长期的解剖和功能结局。