文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在健康技术评估和健康经济学中捕捉疫苗接种的价值:国家分析和优先价值概念。

Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Country analysis and priority value concepts.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology & Therapy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

GSK, Wavre, Belgium.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2022 Jun 26;40(30):3999-4007. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.026. Epub 2022 May 18.


DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.026
PMID:35597688
Abstract

BACKGROUND: A value of vaccination framework for economic evaluation (EE) identified unique value concepts for the broad benefits vaccination provides to individuals, society, healthcare systems and national economies. The objectives of this paper were to work with experts in developed countries to objectively identify three priority concepts to extend current EE. METHODS: The previously developed classification of value concepts in vaccination distinguished 18 concepts, categorised as conventional payer and societal perspective concepts and novel broader societal concepts. Their inclusion in current EE guidelines was assessed. Experts identified eight criteria relevant to decision-making and measurement feasibility, which were weighted and used to score each concept. The relative ranking of concepts by importance and the gaps in guidelines were used to identify three priority concepts on which to focus immediate efforts to extend EE. RESULTS: The EE guidelines review highlighted differences across countries and between guidelines and practice. Conventional payer perspective concepts (e.g., individual and societal health gains and medical costs) were generally included, while gaps were evident for conventional societal perspective concepts (e.g., family/caregiver health and economic gains). Few novel broader societal benefits were considered, and only in ad hoc cases. The top-three concepts for near-term consideration: macroeconomic gains (e.g., benefiting the economy, tourism), social equity and ethics (e.g., equal distribution of health outcomes, reduced health/financial equity gaps) and health systems strengthening, resilience and security (e.g., efficiency gains, reduced disruption, increased capacity). CONCLUSIONS: Gaps, inconsistencies and limited assessment of vaccination value in EE can lead to differences in policy and vaccination access. The three priority concepts identified provide a feasible approach for capturing VoV more broadly in the near-term. Robust methods for measuring and valuing these concepts in future assessments will help strengthen the evidence used to inform decisions, improving access to vaccines that are demonstrably good value for money from society's point of view.

摘要

背景:疫苗经济学评价(EE)的价值框架确定了疫苗为个人、社会、医疗保健系统和国家经济带来广泛益处所具有的独特价值概念。本文的目的是与发达国家的专家合作,客观地确定三个优先概念,以扩展当前的 EE。

方法:先前开发的疫苗价值概念分类区分了 18 个概念,分为常规支付方和社会视角概念以及新颖的更广泛的社会概念。评估了它们在当前 EE 指南中的纳入情况。专家确定了与决策和测量可行性相关的八项标准,这些标准被加权并用于对每个概念进行评分。根据重要性和指南中的差距对概念进行相对排名,以确定三个优先概念,重点关注立即扩大 EE 的努力。

结果:EE 指南审查突出了国家之间以及指南与实践之间的差异。常规支付方视角的概念(例如,个人和社会健康收益和医疗成本)通常被包括在内,而常规社会视角的概念(例如,家庭/照顾者健康和经济收益)则存在差距。很少考虑到新颖的更广泛的社会利益,而且只是在特定情况下。近期需要考虑的三个优先概念:宏观经济收益(例如,有利于经济、旅游业)、社会公平和伦理(例如,健康结果的平等分配、减少健康/财务公平差距)以及卫生系统的加强、弹性和安全(例如,效率提高、减少中断、能力增强)。

结论:EE 中疫苗价值评估的差距、不一致和有限评估可能导致政策和疫苗可及性的差异。确定的三个优先概念为在近期更广泛地捕获 VoV 提供了可行的方法。在未来的评估中,用于衡量和评估这些概念的稳健方法将有助于加强用于为决策者提供信息的证据,从而改善从社会角度来看具有明显价值的疫苗的可及性。

相似文献

[1]
Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Country analysis and priority value concepts.

Vaccine. 2022-6-26

[2]
Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Literature review and novel conceptual framework.

Vaccine. 2022-6-26

[3]
Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics-Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts.

Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-15

[4]
Systematic review of studies evaluating the broader economic impact of vaccination in low and middle income countries.

BMC Public Health. 2012-10-16

[5]
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders

2016-3-14

[6]
Strengthening national decision-making on immunization by building capacity for economic evaluation: Implementing ProVac in Europe.

Vaccine. 2015-5-7

[7]
Recognizing the Broader Value of Meningococcal Vaccination: A Matter of Evidence, Ability, or Willingness?

Value Health. 2023-10

[8]
How is the Societal Perspective Defined in Health Technology Assessment? Guidelines from Around the Globe.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2023-2

[9]
Universal Health Coverage and Essential Packages of Care

2017-11-27

[10]
[The economic value of vaccinations: a systematic review of Italian economic evaluations and HTA reports].

Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2017

引用本文的文献

[1]
Market and Non-Market Productivity Losses Associated with Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the USA.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2025-6

[2]
A Structured Narrative Literature Review of the Broader Value of Adult Immunisation Programmes.

Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-29

[3]
Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics-Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts.

Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-15

[4]
The macroeconomic impact of a dengue outbreak: Case studies from Thailand and Brazil.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024-6-3

[5]
Socioeconomic and fiscal returns of expanded investment in immunization: a case for life-course vaccination in Colombia.

Health Aff Sch. 2024-4-25

[6]
Improving Vaccine Assessment Pathways and Decision Making in the Polish Immunization Program.

Vaccines (Basel). 2024-3-9

[7]
Modelling the Public Health Burden of Herpes Zoster and the Impact of Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Five Selected Countries in Southeast Asia.

Infect Dis Ther. 2024-4

[8]
On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-9

[9]
The Annual Economic Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adults in the United States.

J Infect Dis. 2024-8-16

[10]
Rule of Prevention: a potential framework to evaluate preventive interventions for rare diseases.

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023-8-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索