Suppr超能文献

在卫生技术评估和卫生经济学中体现疫苗接种的价值——通过纳入关键概念扩大估值的实际考量

Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics-Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts.

作者信息

Biundo Eliana, Dronova Mariia, Chicoye Annie, Cookson Richard, Devlin Nancy, Doherty T Mark, Garcia Stephanie, Garcia-Ruiz Antonio J, Garrison Louis P, Nolan Terry, Postma Maarten, Salisbury David, Shah Hiral, Sheikh Shazia, Smith Richard, Toumi Mondher, Wasem Jurgen, Beck Ekkehard

机构信息

GSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.

Putnam PHMR, 30-701 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;12(7):773. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070773.

Abstract

Following the development of a value of vaccination (VoV) framework for health technology assessment/cost-effectiveness analysis (HTA/CEA), and identification of three vaccination benefits for near-term inclusion in HTA/CEA, this final paper provides decision makers with methods and examples to consider benefits of health systems strengthening (HSS), equity, and macroeconomic gains. Expert working groups, targeted literature reviews, and case studies were used. Opportunity cost methods were applied for HSS benefits of rotavirus vaccination. Vaccination, with HSS benefits included, reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by 1.4-50.5% (to GBP 11,552-GBP 23,016) depending on alternative conditions considered. Distributional CEA was applied for health equity benefits of meningococcal vaccination. Nearly 80% of prevented cases were among the three most deprived groups. Vaccination, with equity benefits included, reduced the ICER by 22-56% (to GBP 7014-GBP 12,460), depending on equity parameters. Macroeconomic models may inform HTA deliberative processes (e.g., disease impact on the labour force and the wider economy), or macroeconomic outcomes may be assessed for individuals in CEAs (e.g., impact on non-health consumption, leisure time, and income). These case studies show how to assess broader vaccination benefits in current HTA/CEA, providing decision makers with more accurate and complete VoV assessments. More work is needed to refine inputs and methods, especially for macroeconomic gains.

摘要

在制定用于卫生技术评估/成本效益分析(HTA/CEA)的疫苗接种价值(VoV)框架,并确定近期纳入HTA/CEA的三项疫苗接种益处之后,本终期论文为决策者提供了方法和示例,以考量卫生系统强化(HSS)、公平性和宏观经济收益等益处。采用了专家工作组、针对性文献综述和案例研究的方法。机会成本法应用于轮状病毒疫苗接种的HSS益处评估。纳入HSS益处后,根据所考虑的替代条件,疫苗接种使增量成本效益比(ICER)降低了1.4%至50.5%(降至11,552英镑至23,016英镑)。分布性CEA应用于脑膜炎球菌疫苗接种的卫生公平益处评估。近80%的预防病例发生在最贫困的三个群体中。纳入公平益处后,根据公平参数,疫苗接种使ICER降低了22%至56%(降至7014英镑至12,460英镑)。宏观经济模型可为HTA审议过程提供信息(例如疾病对劳动力和更广泛经济的影响),或者在CEA中可为个体评估宏观经济结果(例如对非健康消费、休闲时间和收入的影响)。这些案例研究展示了如何在当前的HTA/CEA中评估更广泛的疫苗接种益处,为决策者提供更准确和完整的VoV评估。需要开展更多工作来完善投入和方法,尤其是针对宏观经济收益方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1a/11281546/e1612e4076c4/vaccines-12-00773-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验