Suppr超能文献

患者导航员团队对实施全市范围乳腺癌患者导航方案的看法:一项定性研究。

Patient navigator team perceptions on the implementation of a citywide breast cancer patient navigation protocol: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Women's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 21;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08090-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2018 Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP), an evidence-based patient navigation intervention aimed at addressing breast cancer care disparities, was implemented across six Boston hospitals. This study assesses patient navigator team member perspectives regarding implementation barriers and facilitators one year post-study implementation.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews at the six sites participating in the pragmatic TRIP trial from December 2019 to March 2021. Navigation team members involved with breast cancer care navigation processes at each site were interviewed at least 12 months after intervention implementation. Interview questions were designed to address domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), focusing on barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention that included 1) rigorous 11-step guidelines for navigation, 2) a shared patient registry and 3) a social risk screening and referral program. Analysis was structured using deductive codes representing domains and constructs within CFIR.

RESULTS

Seventeen interviews were conducted with patient navigators, their supervisors, and designated clinical champions. Participants identified the following benefits provided by the TRIP intervention: 1) increased networking and connections for navigators across clinical sites (Cosmopolitanism), 2) formalization of the patient navigation process (Goals and Purpose, Access to Knowledge and Information, and Relative Advantage), and 3) flexibility within the TRIP intervention that allowed for diversity in implementation and use of TRIP components across sites (Adaptability). Barriers included those related to documentation requirements (Complexity) and the structured patient follow up guidelines that did not always align with the timeline of existing site navigation processes (Relative Priority).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis provides data using real-world experience from an intervention trial in progress, identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing an evidence-based patient navigation intervention for breast cancer care. We identified core processes that facilitated the navigators' patient-focused tasks and role on the clinical team. Barriers encountered reflect limitations of navigator funding models and high caseload.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT03514433 , 5/2/2018.

摘要

背景

2018 年,为了解决乳腺癌护理方面的差异,实施了一项基于证据的患者导航干预措施——转化研究到实践(TRIP),该措施在波士顿的六家医院开展。本研究评估了研究实施一年后,患者导航员团队成员对实施障碍和促进因素的看法。

方法

我们在 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,对参与实用 TRIP 试验的六家医院进行了深入的定性访谈。在干预措施实施后至少 12 个月,对每个参与医院的乳腺癌护理导航过程的导航团队成员进行了采访。采访问题旨在解决实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的领域,重点关注实施该干预措施的障碍和促进因素,包括 1)严格的 11 步导航指南,2)共享患者注册表和 3)社会风险筛查和转介计划。分析采用了代表 CFIR 领域和结构的演绎代码进行结构化。

结果

对 17 名患者导航员、他们的主管和指定的临床负责人进行了访谈。参与者确定了 TRIP 干预措施带来的以下好处:1)跨临床站点增加了导航员的网络和联系(世界主义),2)使患者导航过程正式化(目标和宗旨、获取知识和信息以及相对优势),3)TRIP 干预措施具有灵活性,允许站点之间实施和使用 TRIP 组件的多样性(适应性)。障碍包括与文档要求相关的障碍(复杂性)以及结构化的患者随访指南,这些指南并不总是与现有站点导航流程的时间线一致(相对优先级)。

结论

我们的分析使用正在进行的干预试验的实际经验提供了数据,确定了实施基于证据的患者导航干预措施以改善乳腺癌护理的障碍和促进因素。我们确定了促进导航员关注患者的任务和临床团队角色的核心流程。遇到的障碍反映了导航员资金模式和高工作量的限制。

试验注册

临床试验注册号 NCT03514433,2018 年 5 月 2 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aed/9124395/9348afecea58/12913_2022_8090_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验