Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):513.e1-513.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.031. Epub 2022 May 19.
The few studies that have addressed the relationship between severity of intrapartum fever and neonatal and maternal morbidity have had mixed results. The impact of the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery on neonatal outcomes remains unknown.
To test the association of severity of intrapartum fever and duration from reaching maximum temperature to delivery with neonatal and maternal morbidity.
This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of term, singleton patients admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor who had intrapartum fever (≥38°C). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to maximum temperature during labor: afebrile (<38°C), mild fever (38°C-39°C), and severe fever (>39°C). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (umbilical artery pH <7.1, mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress, meconium aspiration with pulmonary hypertension, hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and Apgar <7 at 5 minutes). Secondary outcomes were composite neonatal neurologic morbidity (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, hypothermia treatment, and seizures) and composite maternal morbidity (postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and maternal packed red blood cell transfusion). Outcomes were compared between the maximum temperature groups using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling accounted for the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery.
Of the 8132 patients included, 278 (3.4%) had a mild fever and 74 (0.9%) had a severe fever. The incidence of composite neonatal morbidity increased with intrapartum fever severity (afebrile 5.4% vs mild 18.0% vs severe 29.7%; P<.01). After adjusting for confounders, there were increased odds of composite neonatal morbidity with severe fever compared with mild fever (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.48]). Severe fevers remained associated with composite neonatal morbidity compared with mild fevers after accounting for the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.43]). Composite neonatal neurologic morbidity and composite maternal morbidity were not different between patients with mild and patients with severe fevers.
Composite neonatal morbidity correlated with intrapartum fever severity in a potentially dose-dependent fashion. This correlation was independent of the duration from reaching maximum intrapartum temperature to delivery, suggesting that clinical management of intrapartum fever, in terms of timing or mode of delivery, should not be affected by this duration.
少数研究探讨了产时发热的严重程度与新生儿和产妇发病率之间的关系,但结果不一。从达到最高产时体温到分娩的时间对新生儿结局的影响尚不清楚。
检验产时发热严重程度和从达到最高体温到分娩的时间与新生儿和产妇发病率的关系。
这是一项对因引产或自然分娩入院的足月单胎患者进行的前瞻性队列的二次分析,这些患者有产时发热(≥38°C)。根据产时的最高体温,患者被分为 3 组:无发热(<38°C)、轻度发热(38°C-39°C)和重度发热(>39°C)。主要结局是复合新生儿发病率(脐动脉 pH 值<7.1、机械通气、呼吸窘迫、胎粪吸入合并肺动脉高压、低血糖、新生儿重症监护病房入院和 5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7)。次要结局是复合新生儿神经系统发病率(缺氧缺血性脑病、低温治疗和癫痫发作)和复合产妇发病率(产后出血、子宫内膜炎和产妇输注红细胞悬液)。使用多变量逻辑回归比较最大体温组之间的结局。Cox 比例风险回归模型考虑了从达到最高产时体温到分娩的时间。
在纳入的 8132 名患者中,278 名(3.4%)有轻度发热,74 名(0.9%)有重度发热。产时发热严重程度与复合新生儿发病率增加相关(无发热 5.4%,轻度发热 18.0%,重度发热 29.7%;P<.01)。调整混杂因素后,与轻度发热相比,重度发热的复合新生儿发病率的优势比增加(调整优势比,1.93[95%置信区间,1.07-3.48])。在考虑到从达到最高产时体温到分娩的时间后,重度发热仍与复合新生儿发病率相关,与轻度发热相比(调整风险比,2.05[95%置信区间,1.23-3.43])。轻度发热和重度发热的患者复合新生儿神经系统发病率和复合产妇发病率无差异。
复合新生儿发病率与产时发热严重程度呈潜在剂量依赖性相关。这种相关性与从达到最高产时体温到分娩的时间无关,这表明产时发热的临床管理,无论是在时间上还是分娩方式上,都不应受此时间的影响。