• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤:移植时间对预后的影响。

Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Time to Transplant on the Outcome.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Sep;22(9):e826-e835. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.020
PMID:35599086
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a standard therapy for transplant eligible patients of multiple myeloma (MM). To evaluate impact of time to transplant on subsequent outcomes, we analyzed data on consecutive MM patients who received novel agents-based induction prior to transplant.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2019, 363 MM patients underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 years, ranging from 20 to 72 years, 233 (64.2%) were males. Median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 11.5 months (range, 4-67.5); 201 (55.4%) patients underwent ASCT within 12 months (early) and 162 (44.6%) beyond 12 months since diagnosis (delayed ASCT). Primary objective was progression-free survival. Secondary objectives were-response rate to transplant, overall survival (OS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM).

RESULTS

Post-ASCT complete response (CR) (77.1% vs. 64.8%; P < .025) and CR+ very good partial response rate (89% vs. 81.5%; P < .03) was higher for early ASCT cohort. Engraftment characteristics, regimen-related toxicities, and day +100 TRM (3.5% vs 3.7%; P = .564) were similar in 2 cohorts. Median OS for early versus late cohort from date of diagnosis is 127.0 (95% CI, 98.9-155.1) versus 104.5 months (95% CI, 79.3-129.6; P = .356) and from date of transplant is 119.0 (95% CI, 93.4-144.6) versus 89.5 months (95% CI, 57.4-121.6), P < .02. Median PFS is better for early transplant cohort; 69.5 (95% CI, 56.7-82.3) versus 50.0 months (95% CI, 35.6-64.4), P < .05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early transplant for myeloma is associated with higher response rate and better progression-free survival.

摘要

背景

自体干细胞移植(ASCT)是适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的标准治疗方法。为了评估移植时间对后续结果的影响,我们分析了在移植前接受新型药物诱导治疗的连续 MM 患者的数据。

方法

2006 年至 2019 年间,363 例 MM 患者接受了 ASCT。患者的中位年龄为 52 岁,范围为 20-72 岁,233 例(64.2%)为男性。诊断至移植的中位间隔为 11.5 个月(范围为 4-67.5);201 例(55.4%)患者在 12 个月内(早期)接受 ASCT,162 例(44.6%)超过诊断后 12 个月(延迟 ASCT)。主要目标是无进展生存期。次要目标是移植后的缓解率、总生存期(OS)和移植相关死亡率(TRM)。

结果

早期 ASCT 队列的移植后完全缓解(CR)(77.1% vs. 64.8%;P <.025)和 CR+非常好的部分缓解率(89% vs. 81.5%;P <.03)更高。2 个队列的嵌合特征、方案相关毒性和第 100 天的 TRM(3.5% vs. 3.7%;P = .564)相似。早期和晚期队列从诊断日期的中位 OS 分别为 127.0(95%CI,98.9-155.1)和 104.5 个月(95%CI,79.3-129.6;P = .356),从移植日期的中位 OS 分别为 119.0(95%CI,93.4-144.6)和 89.5 个月(95%CI,57.4-121.6),P <.02。早期移植队列的中位 PFS 更好;69.5(95%CI,56.7-82.3)与 50.0 个月(95%CI,35.6-64.4),P <.05。

结论

多发性骨髓瘤的早期移植与更高的缓解率和更好的无进展生存期相关。

相似文献

1
Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Time to Transplant on the Outcome.多发性骨髓瘤:移植时间对预后的影响。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Sep;22(9):e826-e835. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission is associated with better progression-free survival in multiple myeloma.自体干细胞移植在第一次缓解期与多发性骨髓瘤患者更好的无进展生存期相关。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Oct;97(10):1869-1877. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3370-1. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.来那度胺联合化疗与自体移植,随后来那度胺联合泼尼松与来那度胺维持治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者:一项随机、多中心、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1617-29. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00389-7. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
4
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma: Predictors of long-term outcome.大剂量化疗后自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤:长期预后的预测因素。
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Jun;149(6):730-739. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1593_18.
5
Autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Long-term results.多发性骨髓瘤的自体干细胞移植:长期结果
Natl Med J India. 2016 Jul-Aug;29(4):192-199.
6
[Bortezomib-based induction therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma].硼替佐米诱导治疗后自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;53(11):865-72.
7
Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.卡非佐米联合环磷酰胺和地塞米松或来那度胺和地塞米松联合自体移植,或卡非佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松,随后用卡非佐米联合来那度胺或来那度胺维持治疗新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者(FORTE):一项随机、开放标签、2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Dec;22(12):1705-1720. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00535-0. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Clinical factors associated with autologous stem cell transplantation outcomes in multiple myeloma: upfront transplant with MEL200 remains the standard of care.与多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植结果相关的临床因素:采用MEL200进行前期移植仍是治疗标准。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Jan;103(1):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05511-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
9
[A Propensity Score Matching Study of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and New Drug Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma].[一项关于自体造血干细胞移植与新药化疗治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的倾向评分匹配研究]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Feb;30(1):158-165. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.01.026.
10
Second autologous stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy for multiple myeloma: impact on progression-free and overall survival.自体干细胞移植作为多发性骨髓瘤挽救疗法的第 2 次治疗:对无进展生存期和总生存期的影响。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 May;18(5):773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.044. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Deductible Health Plans and Out-of-Pocket Health Care Costs Among Younger Patients With Multiple Myeloma.高免赔额健康保险计划与年轻多发性骨髓瘤患者的自付医疗费用
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 May 12:OP2400978. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00978.
2
Optimizing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Significance of Pre-Transplant Controlling Nutritional Status Score.优化多发性骨髓瘤的自体干细胞移植:移植前控制营养状况评分的意义
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;15(2):289. doi: 10.3390/life15020289.
3
Real-world multiple myeloma front-line treatment and outcomes by transplant in the United States.
美国多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗的真实世界情况及移植治疗结果
EJHaem. 2023 Aug 4;4(4):984-994. doi: 10.1002/jha2.739. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Differential Diagnosis and Therapeutic Advances in Multiple Myeloma: A Review Article.多发性骨髓瘤的鉴别诊断与治疗进展:一篇综述文章。
Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2023 Sep 15;13:33-57. doi: 10.2147/BLCTT.S272703. eCollection 2023.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) for Multiple Myeloma: While New Horizons Emerge, It Is Still Only a Silver Lining for Resource-Constrained Settings.多发性骨髓瘤自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的长期结果:尽管新的前景出现,但对于资源有限的环境而言,它仍然只是一线希望。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 24;15(3):e36642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36642. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Efficacy and safety of Venetoclax-based regimens in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.基于 Venetoclax 的方案在复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤中的疗效和安全性:前瞻性临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1029-1036. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2186480.