Department of Mechanical Engineering, Velammal Engineering College, Chennai, 600066, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Thandalam, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71650-71664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20914-7. Epub 2022 May 23.
Owing to the low productivity per unit area of a single basin solar still, a stacked solar still configuration which has two basins stacked together has gained popularity due to its increased output for the same area. This paper delivers a detailed comparison between single basin and stacked solar still configurations based on thermodynamic and economic analysis. A single slope single basin and double basin solar still of same base area of 0.5 m were fabricated and tested at Velammal Engineering College, Chennai, in the month of March 2020. The average daily productivity obtained from the single basin and stacked still configuration are 1.416 L/day and 1.913 L/day, respectively. The thermo-economic analysis gives detailed information about the exergy destruction of each component of the solar still and the overall exergy efficiency of both the configurations. The energy and exergy efficiency of the stacked solar still is higher than the single basin solar still due to lower energy loss in the stacked solar still configuration. In order to optimize the cost of the distilled water, an economic feasibility analysis is carried out, and it is observed that the cost per liter of distilled water produced from a single basin solar still is 29.9% higher than the stacked solar still. The payback period of the stacked solar still is 540 days, whereas it is 459 days for a single basin solar still. The results from the analysis further justify the thermo economic feasibility of a stacked solar still.
由于单个盆式太阳能蒸馏器的单位面积生产率较低,因此,由于其在相同面积上的产量增加,堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器配置已变得流行。本文基于热力学和经济分析对单盆式和堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器配置进行了详细比较。在 2020 年 3 月,在钦奈的 Velammal 工程学院制造和测试了单斜率单盆和双盆太阳能蒸馏器,其基底面积均为 0.5m。从单盆和堆叠式蒸馏器配置中获得的平均日产量分别为 1.416L/天和 1.913L/天。热经济分析提供了有关太阳能蒸馏器每个组件的火用损耗以及两种配置的整体火用效率的详细信息。由于堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器配置中的能量损失较低,因此堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器的能量和火用效率高于单盆太阳能蒸馏器。为了优化蒸馏水的成本,进行了经济可行性分析,结果表明,从单盆太阳能蒸馏器生产的每升蒸馏水的成本比堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器高 29.9%。堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器的投资回收期为 540 天,而单盆太阳能蒸馏器的投资回收期为 459 天。分析结果进一步证明了堆叠式太阳能蒸馏器在热经济方面的可行性。