Suppr超能文献

在低骨密度颌骨中,骨密度增加与传统手术技术:一项分口体内研究。

Osseo-densification versus conventional surgical technique in low density jaw bone: A split mouth in vivo study.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1117-1124. doi: 10.3233/THC-220048.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The success of dental implants depend on implant design, surgical technique, bone density, implant morphology and postoperative care. Initial stability is utmost importance and is of concern in low density bone. The osseo-densification strategy enhance primary stability by raising density of the osteotomy site walls by non-subtractive drilling, unlike conventional technique.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this in vivo study was to assess and compare the osseo-densification implant drilling technique with conventional implant drilling in terms of primary implant stability along with other factors, plaque index, bleeding on probe, pocket depth and radiographic assessment of bone density, marginal bone loss using CBCT.

METHOD

A total of 20 patients aged between 40 and 59 years were included in this research. A split-mouth configuration of 40 implants was used. In the osseo-densification group, specialized (Densah) bur kit was used to insert 20 implants on one side. In the conventional group, standard bur kit was used to insert 20 implants on the opposite side of the jaw. For each patient, clinical and radiographic assessment was performed at regular intervals at the beginning (immediately after surgery), seven months, and a year following surgery.

RESULTS

With the exception of bone density, which was statistically significant in favour of the osseo-densification group immediately after surgery, primary and secondary stability, plaque index, bleeding on probe, pocket depth and even marginal bone loss were not significantly different between the two groups in this investigation.

CONCLUSION

Osseo-densification technique provided a better primary stability in the low density bone cases thus, can be consider as a trustworthy treatment for speeding up the healing process while also maintaining marginal bone integrity following loading. Use of specialized bur while drilling procedure improves the density around the implants.

摘要

背景

种植牙的成功取决于种植体设计、手术技术、骨密度、种植体形态和术后护理。初始稳定性至关重要,在骨密度较低的情况下尤为重要。骨密实化策略通过非减径钻孔来提高骨切开部位壁的密度来增强初始稳定性,与传统技术不同。

目的

本体内研究旨在评估和比较骨密实化种植体钻孔技术与传统种植体钻孔技术在初始种植体稳定性方面的差异,并评估其他因素,如菌斑指数、探针出血、探诊深度和使用 CBCT 评估的骨密度、边缘骨丧失。

方法

本研究共纳入 20 名年龄在 40 至 59 岁之间的患者。采用 40 个种植体的半口配置。在骨密实化组中,使用专用(Densah)钻头套件在一侧插入 20 个种植体。在常规组中,使用标准钻头套件在对侧下颌骨插入 20 个种植体。对于每个患者,在手术开始时(手术后立即)、七个月和一年后定期进行临床和放射学评估。

结果

除了手术后立即骨密度统计学上有利于骨密实化组外,本研究中两组的初始和二次稳定性、菌斑指数、探针出血、探诊深度甚至边缘骨丧失均无显著差异。

结论

骨密实化技术在骨密度较低的情况下提供了更好的初始稳定性,因此可以考虑作为一种可靠的治疗方法,以加快愈合过程,同时在负荷后保持边缘骨完整性。在钻孔过程中使用专用钻头可提高种植体周围的密度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验