• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Temporal patterns, characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架血栓形成患者的临床结局的时间模式、特征和预测因素。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 21;18(9):729-739. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00049.
2
Optimal P2Y12 Inhibitor in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的最佳 P2Y12 抑制剂:网状荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 23;9(10):1036-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.013.
3
Stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Are the new P2Y12 inhibitors really more effective than clopidogrel?院外心脏骤停昏迷幸存者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架血栓形成:新型 P2Y12 抑制剂真的比氯吡格雷更有效吗?
Resuscitation. 2016 Jan;98:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
4
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2329-2337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
Assessing the Clinical Treatment Dynamics of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US.评估美国急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的临床治疗动态。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8585.
6
Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on prevention of stent thrombosis in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者预防支架血栓形成的影响:网状荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):488-494. doi: 10.1002/clc.23536. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
A comparison of cangrelor, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中坎格雷洛、普拉格雷、替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Mar;18(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
No Benefit of Ticagrelor Pretreatment Compared With Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛预处理与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗相比无获益。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005528. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005528.
9
Effect of prasugrel pre-treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI: the ACCOAST-PCI study.在非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中普拉格雷预处理策略的效果:ACCOAST-PCI 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):2563-2571. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.053.
10
Association of different antiplatelet therapies with mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.不同抗血小板治疗与初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率的关系。
Heart. 2018 Oct;104(20):1683-1690. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312366. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for early versus late and very late stent thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成的临床转归:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Apr;51(3):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02184-7.
2
Management of myocardial revascularisation failure: an expert consensus document of the EAPCI.心肌血运重建失败的管理:EAPCI 的专家共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Dec 4;16(11):e875-e890. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00487.
3
Multivessel versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行多支血管与罪犯血管血运重建的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Nov;109(11):1381-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01637-6. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Attribution of Adverse Events Following Coronary Stent Placement Identified Using Administrative Claims Data.利用行政索赔数据识别冠状动脉支架置入术后不良事件的归因。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e013606. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013606. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
5
Incidence and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Stent Thrombosis (from the Japanese Nationwide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry).支架血栓形成患者的发生率和住院结局(来自日本全国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;125(5):720-726. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Incidence and predictors of outcomes after a first definite coronary stent thrombosis.首次明确冠状动脉支架血栓形成后的发生率和结局预测因素。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e344-e350. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00219.
7
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 20;14(14):1435-1534. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M01_01.
8
The influence of Elixhauser comorbidity index on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes.Elixhauser 合并症指数对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 1;94(2):195-203. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28072. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗临床试验的标准化终点定义:学术研究联合会-2 共识文件。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.
10
Effect of Coronary Collaterals on Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉侧支循环对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗预后的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Angiology. 2018 Oct;69(9):803-811. doi: 10.1177/0003319718768399. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架血栓形成患者的临床结局的时间模式、特征和预测因素。

Temporal patterns, characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis.

机构信息

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 21;18(9):729-739. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00049.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00049
PMID:35599596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10241267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following stent thrombosis (ST) and differences exist based on timing.

AIMS

Our aim was to study the rates of PCI procedures for an ST indication among all patients admitted for PCI at a national level and to compare their characteristics and procedural outcomes based on ST timing.

METHODS

All PCI procedures in England and Wales (2014-2020) were retrospectively analysed and stratified by the presence of ST into four groups: non-ST, early ST (0-30 days), late ST (>30-360 days), very late ST (>360 days). Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital MACCE (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, a composite of mortality, acute stroke and reinfarction) and mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 7,923 (1.4%) procedures were for ST indication, most commonly for early ST (n=4,171; 52.6%), followed by very late ST (n=2,801; 35.4%) and late ST (n=951; 12.0%). The rate of PCI for ST declined between 2014 and 2020 (1.7 to 1.4%; p<0.001). Early ST was the only subgroup associated with increased odds of MACCE (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.41), all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36) and reinfarction (OR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.48-4.14), compared with non-ST indication. The odds of mortality were significantly reduced in ST patients with the use of intravascular imaging (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92) and newer P2Y inhibitors (ticagrelor: OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.95; prasugrel: OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI for ST has declined in frequency over a 7-year period, with most procedures performed for early ST. Among the different times of ST onset, only early ST is associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI. Routine use of intravascular imaging and newer P2Y inhibitors could further improve outcomes in this high-risk procedural group.

摘要

背景

关于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后支架血栓形成(ST)的结局数据有限,并且根据时间的不同而存在差异。

目的

我们的目的是研究在全国范围内,因 ST 指征而行 PCI 的所有患者中 PCI 手术的比例,并根据 ST 发生时间比较其特征和手术结局。

方法

回顾性分析了英格兰和威尔士(2014-2020 年)所有的 PCI 手术,并根据 ST 的存在分为 4 组:非 ST、早期 ST(0-30 天)、晚期 ST(>30-360 天)、极晚期 ST(>360 天)。采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估院内 MACCE(主要不良心血管和脑血管事件,死亡、急性卒中和再梗死的综合指标)和死亡率的比值比(OR)。

结果

总体而言,7923 例(1.4%)手术是 ST 指征,最常见的是早期 ST(n=4171;52.6%),其次是极晚期 ST(n=2801;35.4%)和晚期 ST(n=951;12.0%)。2014 年至 2020 年间,因 ST 而行 PCI 的比例下降(1.7%降至 1.4%;p<0.001)。与非 ST 指征相比,早期 ST 是唯一与 MACCE(OR 1.22,95%CI:1.05-1.41)、全因死亡率(OR 1.21,95%CI:1.07-1.36)和再梗死(OR 2.48,95%CI:1.48-4.14)风险增加相关的亚组。与 ST 患者相比,血管内成像(OR 0.66,95%CI:0.48-0.92)和新型 P2Y 抑制剂(替格瑞洛:OR 0.69,95%CI:0.49-0.95;普拉格雷:OR 0.54,95%CI:0.30-0.96)的使用显著降低了死亡率的可能性。

结论

在 7 年期间,因 ST 而行 PCI 的频率有所下降,其中大多数手术是针对早期 ST 进行的。在 ST 发生的不同时间中,只有早期 ST 与 PCI 后更差的临床结局相关。常规使用血管内成像和新型 P2Y 抑制剂可以进一步改善这一高危手术人群的结局。