• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次明确冠状动脉支架血栓形成后的发生率和结局预测因素。

Incidence and predictors of outcomes after a first definite coronary stent thrombosis.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e344-e350. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00219.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00219
PMID:31475906
Abstract

AIMS

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of coronary artery stenting. Little is known about the optimal treatment strategy at the time of an ST event. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of adverse cardiac events after treatment of a definite ST.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 695 patients with definite ST were included between 1996 and 2017 in two academic medical centres. The primary endpoint was MACE, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR). Mean age was 62.8±12.1 years and 76.3% were male. ST occurred at a median of 22 days (IQR 3-551 days); 50.8% were early and 49.2% were late/very late ST. At 60-month follow-up, the MACE rate was 43.7%, cardiac death 19.5%, MI 17.9%, TVR 24.8%, and repeat definite ST was 12.1% (10.5% in target vessel). Independent predictors of MACE were cardiogenic shock (HR 2.54, 95% CI: 1.75-3.70; p<0.001), ST in the LAD (HR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.32-2.35; p<0.001), prior CVA/TIA (HR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.08-2.62; p=0.020), peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00-2.39; p=0.046), multivessel disease (HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.12-2.08; p=0.007), and final TIMI flow 2-3 (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85; p=0.009). No specific treatment of ST influenced MACE; however, new-generation P2Y12 inhibitors reduced the risk of MI (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.99; p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of adverse events remains high after a first episode of ST. New-generation P2Y12 inhibitors reduce the risk of MI. Additional stenting, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombectomy did not improve outcomes following ST.

摘要

目的

支架血栓形成(ST)是冠状动脉支架置入术的一种罕见但潜在致命的并发症。对于 ST 事件发生时的最佳治疗策略知之甚少。我们旨在确定明确 ST 治疗后的不良心脏事件的发生率和预测因素。

方法和结果

在两个学术医疗中心,1996 年至 2017 年间共纳入 695 例明确 ST 患者。主要终点是 MACE,即心脏死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)的复合终点。平均年龄为 62.8±12.1 岁,76.3%为男性。ST 发生的中位数为 22 天(IQR 3-551 天);50.8%为早期 ST,49.2%为晚期/极晚期 ST。60 个月随访时,MACE 发生率为 43.7%,心脏死亡 19.5%,MI 17.9%,TVR 24.8%,再次明确 ST 为 12.1%(靶血管为 10.5%)。MACE 的独立预测因素为心源性休克(HR 2.54,95%CI:1.75-3.70;p<0.001)、LAD 中的 ST(HR 1.76,95%CI:1.32-2.35;p<0.001)、既往 CVA/TIA(HR 1.68,95%CI:1.08-2.62;p=0.020)、外周血管疾病(HR 1.55,95%CI:1.00-2.39;p=0.046)、多血管疾病(HR 1.53,95%CI:1.12-2.08;p=0.007)和最终 TIMI 血流 2-3(HR 0.54,95%CI:0.34-0.85;p=0.009)。ST 的特定治疗方法并未影响 MACE;然而,新一代 P2Y12 抑制剂降低了 MI 的风险(HR 0.56,95%CI:0.32-0.99;p=0.049)。

结论

首次 ST 后不良事件的发生率仍然很高。新一代 P2Y12 抑制剂可降低 MI 的风险。在 ST 后,额外的支架置入、GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂和血栓切除术并未改善结局。

相似文献

1
Incidence and predictors of outcomes after a first definite coronary stent thrombosis.首次明确冠状动脉支架血栓形成后的发生率和结局预测因素。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e344-e350. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00219.
2
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
3
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
4
Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).全患者人群行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后第一代或第二代药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架植入术后 2 年的结果:来自 PRODIGY 研究(支架内内膜增生分级后延长双联抗血小板治疗研究)的预先指定分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results From SORT OUT IV.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:SORT OUT IV 研究 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):751-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.051.
6
The three year follow-up of the randomised "all-comers" trial of a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (LEADERS).生物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(LEADERS)随机“所有患者”试验的 3 年随访结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Nov;7(7):789-95. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I7A125.
7
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
8
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent (GHOST) registry.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司或紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:Guthrie 卫生保健非适应证支架(GHOST)注册研究的 2 年结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12016.x. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
10
Deployment of drug-eluting stents for isolated proximal lad disease is associated with lower major adverse cardiac events and no increase in stent thrombosis when compared with bare metal stents: a 5-year observational cohort study.与金属裸支架相比,药物洗脱支架治疗孤立性近端 lad 病变与较低的主要不良心脏事件和支架血栓形成无关:一项 5 年观察性队列研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;81(6):E237-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24513. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for Stent Thrombosis: SPARTAN-ST Study.紫杉醇药物涂层球囊单纯血管成形术治疗支架内血栓形成的评估:SPARTAN-ST研究。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 5;12(2):59. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020059.
2
Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis.冠状动脉内成像在支架血栓管理中的临床影响
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 9;13(16):4667. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164667.
3
Temporal patterns, characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架血栓形成患者的临床结局的时间模式、特征和预测因素。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 21;18(9):729-739. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00049.