• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚的疫情限制措施:对阿姆哈拉州法院家庭法案件的影响。

Pandemic restrictions in Ethiopia: Impact on family law cases in Amhara regional state courts.

作者信息

Getnet Asnakech

机构信息

European Joint Doctorate on Law and Development (EDoLaD) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.

School of Law, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Fam Court Rev. 2022 Apr;60(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12637. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1111/fcre.12637
PMID:35601196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9111630/
Abstract

This article discusses the impact of pandemic restrictions on the family court system in Ethiopia. As lack of technological infrastructure made shifting to online services impossible, court services remained in-person. Public health measures required a drastic reduction in case hearings in order to allow social distancing. Both federal and regional state courts were partially closed from early March 2020 to end of September 2020 and only entertained cases of "urgent" nature that affected life, liberty, and public safety. The article focuses on strategies adopted by family courts in Amhara Regional State with respect to its impacts on litigating parties in such courts. It argues partial closure of court services disrupted access to justice in family law cases and increased vulnerability of women and children. This article proposes alternative strategies other than partial closure of court services.

摘要

本文探讨了疫情限制措施对埃塞俄比亚家庭法院系统的影响。由于缺乏技术基础设施,无法转向在线服务,法院服务仍为面对面形式。公共卫生措施要求大幅减少案件听证会,以实现社交距离。从2020年3月初到2020年9月底,联邦和地区州法院均部分关闭,只受理影响生命、自由和公共安全的“紧急”性质案件。本文重点关注阿姆哈拉州家庭法院针对此类法院对诉讼当事人的影响所采取的策略。文章认为,法院服务的部分关闭扰乱了家庭法案件的司法救助,并增加了妇女和儿童的脆弱性。本文提出了除法院服务部分关闭之外的替代策略。

相似文献

1
Pandemic restrictions in Ethiopia: Impact on family law cases in Amhara regional state courts.埃塞俄比亚的疫情限制措施:对阿姆哈拉州法院家庭法案件的影响。
Fam Court Rev. 2022 Apr;60(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12637. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis.危机时期的法院创新与司法救助
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):447-453. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on Florida family dependency drug courts.新冠疫情对佛罗里达家庭抚养毒品法庭的影响。
Health Justice. 2024 Feb 8;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00260-1.
4
A Multimethod Exploration of the COVID-Era Transition to Virtual Hearings in Child Welfare Court Cases.儿童福利法庭案件中向虚拟听证会的新冠时代过渡的多方法探索
Child Maltreat. 2024 Aug;29(3):440-450. doi: 10.1177/10775595241231547. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Remote hearings in family courts in England and Wales during Covid-19: Insights and lessons.新冠疫情期间英格兰和威尔士家事法庭的远程听证:见解与教训
Fam Court Rev. 2022 Apr;60(2):207-219. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.因精神错乱而被判定无罪的患者对精神病学改革的重要性。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-168. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.165.
7
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
8
A National Survey of Problem-Solving Court Staff Perceptions of In-Person versus Virtual Hearings.全国性调查:问题解决法院工作人员对当面听证与虚拟听证的看法。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Mar 11;52(1):15-22. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.230075-23.
9
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
10
Imagining Resilient Courts: from COVID-19 to the Future of Canada's Court System.构想有韧性的法院:从新冠疫情到加拿大法院系统的未来
Can Public Policy. 2022 Mar 1;48(1):186-208. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2021-015.