Liu Yuan-Hui, Cao Zhi-Yuan, Dai Yi-Ning, Zeng Li-Huan, Zhang Ye-Shen, Fan Hua-Lin, Duan Chong-Yang, Tan Ning, He Peng-Cheng
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 4;9:882341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.882341. eCollection 2022.
Infections are not common but important in patients with acute myocardial infarction, and are associated with worse outcomes. Infection was proved to be associated with the use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in several cohorts. It remains unclear whether PPI usage affects infection in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
We consecutively enrolled patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2010 to June 2018. All patients were divided into the PPI group and non-PPI group according to whether the PPI was used. The primary endpoint was the development of infection during hospitalization.
A total of 3027 patients were finally enrolled, with a mean age of 62.2 ± 12.6 years. 310 (10.2%) patients were developed infection during hospitalization. Baseline characteristics were similar between the PPI and non-PPI groups (n = 584 for each group) after propensity score analysis. PPI usage was significantly associated with infection based on the propensity score matching analysis (adjusted OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.02-2.57, = 0.041). Comparing to patients with non-PPI usage, PPI administration was positively associated with higher risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (adjusted OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.06-9.97, = 0.039) and in-hospital major adverse clinical events (adjusted OR = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.61-8.56, = 0.002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the impact of PPI on infection was not significantly different among patients with or without diabetes and patients with age ≥65 years or age <65 years.
PPI usage was related to a higher incidence of infection during hospitalization, in-hospital all-cause mortality, and in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACE) in STEMI patients.
感染在急性心肌梗死患者中并不常见,但很重要,且与更差的预后相关。在几个队列研究中,已证明感染与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用有关。PPI的使用是否会影响急性心肌梗死患者的感染情况仍不清楚。
我们连续纳入了2010年1月至2018年6月期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。根据是否使用PPI,将所有患者分为PPI组和非PPI组。主要终点是住院期间感染的发生情况。
最终共纳入3027例患者,平均年龄为62.2±12.6岁。310例(10.2%)患者在住院期间发生感染。倾向评分分析后,PPI组和非PPI组(每组n = 584)的基线特征相似。基于倾向评分匹配分析,PPI的使用与感染显著相关(校正OR = 1.62,95%CI = 1.02 - 2.57,P = 0.041)。与未使用PPI的患者相比,使用PPI与更高的院内全因死亡率风险(校正OR = 3.25,95%CI = 1.06 - 9.97,P = 0.039)和院内主要不良临床事件风险(校正OR = 3.71,95%CI = 1.61 - 8.56,P = 0.002)呈正相关。亚组分析表明,PPI对感染的影响在有或无糖尿病患者以及年龄≥65岁或年龄<65岁的患者中无显著差异。
在STEMI患者中,使用PPI与住院期间感染、院内全因死亡率和院内主要不良临床事件(MACE)的发生率较高有关。