• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球及日常支持与婚姻状况的纵向关联

Longitudinal Associations of Global and Daily Support with Marital Status.

作者信息

Giff Sarah T, Disabato David D, Renshaw Keith D, Campbell Sarah B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Am J Fam Ther. 2022;50(3):280-294. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2021.1913667. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1080/01926187.2021.1913667
PMID:35602589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9119641/
Abstract

The provision and receipt of emotional support demonstrates benefits for relationships; however, little research has investigated how either global or day-to-day spousal support influences marital stability. This project assessed how global perception of support from a partner and daily provision and receipt of emotional support over 1 week contributed to divorce 10 years later, accounting for demographic covariates. There were no significant associations of support variables with future divorce. Greater education attainment was the only factor significantly associated with decreased risk for divorce. Results suggest that despite potential short-term benefits, global and daily support may not predict long-term marital stability.

摘要

情感支持的给予和接受对人际关系有好处;然而,很少有研究调查伴侣的整体支持或日常支持如何影响婚姻稳定性。本项目评估了对伴侣支持的整体感知以及在1周内情感支持的日常给予和接受在10年后对离婚的影响,并考虑了人口统计学协变量。支持变量与未来离婚之间没有显著关联。更高的教育程度是与离婚风险降低显著相关的唯一因素。结果表明,尽管可能有短期益处,但整体和日常支持可能无法预测长期婚姻稳定性。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Associations of Global and Daily Support with Marital Status.全球及日常支持与婚姻状况的纵向关联
Am J Fam Ther. 2022;50(3):280-294. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2021.1913667. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Do you need to shop around? Age at marriage, spousal alternatives, and marital dissolution.你需要货比三家吗?结婚年龄、配偶选择与婚姻解体。
J Fam Issues. 1995 Jul;16(4):432-49. doi: 10.1177/019251395016004002.
3
Effects of Military Service on Marital Stability Among World War II U.S. Veterans of Japanese Descent.二战期间美籍日裔退伍军人的兵役经历对其婚姻稳定性的影响。
Mil Med. 2018 Sep 1;183(9-10):e525-e531. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy091.
4
Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective.年龄差异不对称与双性视角。
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(1):23-45. doi: 10.1007/BF01797120.
5
Starting over. Why remarriages are more unstable.重新开始。为何再婚关系更不稳定。
J Fam Issues. 1992 Jun;13(2):179-94. doi: 10.1177/019251392013002004.
6
Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study.亲密伴侣暴力作为乌干达农村拉凯婚姻破裂的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Int J Public Health. 2016 Nov;61(8):961-970. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0891-z. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Marital Transitions and Depressive Symptoms among Older Adults: Examining Educational Differences.婚姻变迁与老年人抑郁症状:教育差异的审视。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):407-418. doi: 10.1159/000493681. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Stability of marital unions and fertility in Nigeria.尼日利亚婚姻关系的稳定性与生育率
J Biosoc Sci. 1998 Jan;30(1):33-41. doi: 10.1017/s0021932098000339.
9
The transition to parenthood and marital quality.向为人父母的转变与婚姻质量。
J Fam Issues. 1985 Dec;6(4):435-49. doi: 10.1177/019251385006004003.
10
Family planning: implications for marital stability.计划生育:对婚姻稳定性的影响。
J Divorce. 1980 Spring;3(3):273-81. doi: 10.1300/J279v03n03_07.

本文引用的文献

1
Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies: A Decade in Review.离婚、再婚与继亲家庭:十年回顾
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):81-99. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12651. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
2
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.机器学习揭示了 43 项纵向夫妻研究中最稳健的关系质量自我报告预测因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Supporting a Spouse With Military Posttraumatic Stress: Daily Associations With Partners' Affect.支持患有创伤后应激障碍的军人配偶:与伴侣的情绪的日常关联。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Apr;32(2):323-329. doi: 10.1002/jts.22390. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Marital Transitions and Depressive Symptoms among Older Adults: Examining Educational Differences.婚姻变迁与老年人抑郁症状:教育差异的审视。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):407-418. doi: 10.1159/000493681. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
5
Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.支持需要被看见吗?日常隐形支持可提升次日关系幸福感。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):882-893. doi: 10.1037/fam0000453. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States.将增进社会联系作为美国公共卫生的优先事项。
Am Psychol. 2017 Sep;72(6):517-530. doi: 10.1037/amp0000103.
7
Spouses' daily feelings of appreciation and self-reported well-being.配偶的日常感恩之情与自我报告的幸福感。
Health Psychol. 2017 Dec;36(12):1135-1139. doi: 10.1037/hea0000527. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being.情感支持与工具性支持的提供相互作用,以预测幸福感。
Emotion. 2015 Aug;15(4):484-93. doi: 10.1037/emo0000084. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
9
The Marriage Checkup: a randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups.婚姻体检:年度关系健康检查的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Aug;82(4):592-604. doi: 10.1037/a0037097. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
10
The gray divorce revolution: rising divorce among middle-aged and older adults, 1990-2010.“灰色离婚”革命:中年和老年人群离婚率上升,1990-2010 年。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Nov;67(6):731-41. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs089. Epub 2012 Oct 9.