Leap Braden, Stalp Marybeth C, Kelly Kimberly
Department of Sociology Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS USA.
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminology University of Northern Iowa Cedar Falls IA USA.
Antipode. 2022 Jul;54(4):1166-1187. doi: 10.1111/anti.12813. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
Do volunteers and civil society groups entrench or subvert neoliberalisation? We contribute to this debate by utilising data from 662 self-administered questionnaires and 78 semi-structured interviews with adults who made and distributed personal protective equipment (PPE) in response to a failed federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. The state's failure to protect Americans angered PPE makers, even as they worked to address PPE shortages. Many purposefully assisted populations marginalised by neoliberal policies, taking pride in their ability to help. Although makers generally did not seek to reform the institutions that had failed them, our results indicate that civil society groups may challenge neoliberalisation by rallying communities to mitigate its worst impacts. Instead of being a passive conduit for neoliberalisation, PPE makers' efforts in the USA were more accurately characterised by ambivalent engagements with neoliberalisation that sometimes bolstered collective efforts to challenge neoliberal governance and its associated inequities.
志愿者和民间社会团体是巩固还是颠覆新自由主义化?我们通过使用来自662份自填式问卷的数据以及对78名成年人进行的半结构化访谈来参与这场辩论,这些成年人在美国联邦政府应对新冠疫情不力的情况下制作并分发了个人防护装备(PPE)。尽管PPE制造商努力应对PPE短缺问题,但政府未能保护美国人的做法激怒了他们。许多人特意帮助那些被新自由主义政策边缘化的人群,并为自己的帮助能力感到自豪。尽管制造商通常并不寻求改革那些让他们失望的机构,但我们的研究结果表明,民间社会团体可能会通过团结社区来减轻其最严重的影响,从而挑战新自由主义化。在美国,PPE制造商的努力并非新自由主义化的被动渠道,而更准确地说是以对新自由主义化的矛盾参与为特征,这种参与有时会支持挑战新自由主义治理及其相关不平等现象的集体努力。