Turner B S
Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge.
Br J Sociol. 2001 Jun;52(2):189-209. doi: 10.1080/00071310120044944.
The Marshallian paradigm of social citizenship has been eroded because the social and economic conditions that supported postwar British welfare consensus have been transformed by economic and technological change. This article argues that effective entitlement was based on participation in work, war and reproduction, resulting in three types of social identity: worker-citizens, warrior-citizens and parent-citizens. The casualization of labour and the technological development of war have eroded work and war as routes to active citizenship. Social participation through reproduction remains important, despite massive changes to marriage and family as institutions. In fact the growth of new reproductive technologies have reinforced the normative dominance of marriage as a social relation. These rights of reproduction are described as 'reproductive citizenship'. The article also considers the role of voluntary associations in Third-Way strategies as sources of social cohesion in societies where social capital is in decline, and argues that the voluntary sector is increasingly driven by an economic logic of accumulation. With the erosion of national citizenship, Marshall's three forms of rights (legal, political and social) have been augmented by rights that are global, namely environmental, aboriginal and cultural rights. These are driven by global concerns about the relationship between environment, community and body such that the quest for social security has been replaced by concerns for ontological security.
马歇尔式的社会公民权范式已受到侵蚀,因为支撑战后英国福利共识的社会和经济条件已因经济和技术变革而发生转变。本文认为,有效的权利基于对工作、战争和生育的参与,从而产生了三种社会身份:工人公民、战士公民和父母公民。劳动力的临时工化以及战争的技术发展,侵蚀了工作和战争作为积极公民身份的途径。尽管婚姻和家庭作为制度发生了巨大变化,但通过生育进行社会参与仍然很重要。事实上,新生殖技术的发展强化了婚姻作为一种社会关系的规范主导地位。这些生育权利被描述为“生殖公民权”。本文还探讨了志愿协会在第三条道路战略中的作用,即在社会资本正在衰退的社会中作为社会凝聚力的来源,并认为志愿部门越来越受到积累的经济逻辑的驱动。随着国家公民权的侵蚀,马歇尔的三种权利形式(法律、政治和社会权利)已被全球权利所扩充,即环境、原住民和文化权利。这些权利受到全球对环境、社区和身体之间关系的关注的驱动,以至于对社会保障的追求已被对本体安全的关注所取代。