Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Department of Pharmacy, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jun 21;66(6):e0009922. doi: 10.1128/aac.00099-22. Epub 2022 May 23.
Differences in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment are rarely considered when antifungals are switched in critically ill patients. This study intends to explore whether the antifungal de-escalation treatment strategy and the new intermittent dosing strategy of echinocandins in critically ill patients are able to achieve the corresponding PK/PD targets. The published population PK models of antifungals in critically ill patients and a public data set from the MIMIC-III database ( = 662) were employed to evaluate PK/PD target attainment of different dosing regimens of antifungals. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated for each dosing regimen. Most guideline-recommended dosing regimens of fluconazole and voriconazole could achieve target exposure as de-escalation treatment in critically ill patients. For initial echinocandin treatment, achievement of the target exposure decreased as body weight increased, and the intermittent dosing strategy had a slightly higher CFR value in most simulations compared to conventional dosing strategy. For Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infection, caspofungin at the lowest dose achieved a CFR of >90%, while micafungin or anidulafungin required almost the highest doses simulated in this study to achieve the same effect. None of the echinocandins other than 150 mg every 24 h (q24h) or 200 mg q48h of caspofungin achieved the target CFR for Candida parapsilosis infection. These findings support the guideline-recommended dose of triazoles for antifungal de-escalation treatment and confirm the insufficient dosage of echinocandins in critically ill patients, indicating that a dosing regimen based on body weight or intermittent dosing of echinocandins may be required.
在重症患者中更换抗真菌药物时,很少考虑药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标的差异。本研究旨在探讨抗真菌药物降阶梯治疗策略和棘白菌素类药物新的间歇性给药策略是否能够达到相应的 PK/PD 目标。使用已发表的重症患者抗真菌药物群体药代动力学模型和来自 MIMIC-III 数据库的公共数据集( = 662)来评估不同抗真菌药物给药方案的 PK/PD 目标达标情况。计算了每种给药方案的累积反应分数(CFR)。氟康唑和伏立康唑的大多数指南推荐的给药方案作为重症患者的降阶梯治疗可以达到目标暴露量。对于初始棘白菌素类药物治疗,随着体重的增加,目标暴露量的达标率降低,与常规给药策略相比,间歇性给药策略在大多数模拟中具有略高的 CFR 值。对于白色念珠菌和光滑念珠菌感染,最低剂量的卡泊芬净达到 CFR>90%,而米卡芬净或阿尼芬净需要本研究中模拟的几乎最高剂量才能达到相同效果。除了卡泊芬净 150 mg 每 24 小时(q24h)或 200 mg q48h 以外的其他棘白菌素类药物均无法达到近平滑念珠菌感染的目标 CFR。这些发现支持三唑类药物作为抗真菌药物降阶梯治疗的指南推荐剂量,并证实了重症患者中棘白菌素类药物的剂量不足,表明可能需要基于体重的给药方案或棘白菌素类药物的间歇性给药。