Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(8):2211-2218. doi: 10.1177/03635465221095243. Epub 2022 May 23.
Both beach-chair and lateral decubitus patient positioning are often utilized for shoulder arthroscopy, with each offering its unique advantages and disadvantages. The surgical position is often selected according to each surgeon's preference, with no clear superiority of one position over the other.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair in the beach-chair versus the lateral decubitus position. We hypothesized that patient positioning would not affect clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A list of all patients diagnosed with the Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806 and 29807 between 2015 and 2019 was obtained from the medical records. Patients were only included if arthroscopic posterior labral repair with or without concomitant superior labral anterior to posterior repair was confirmed. Data collected for eligible patients included the number of anchors used, perioperative and postoperative complications, redislocations, subjective instability, reoperation, and revision. Patients were also contacted to complete several patient-reported outcome surveys. Preoperative data, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery in the beach-chair versus lateral decubitus position.
Overall, 126 patients were included-69 patients underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position and 57 in the beach-chair position-with a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.7 years. There were no significant pre- or perioperative differences between groups. Rates of postoperative dislocations, subjective instability, reoperations, revisions, all complications, and return to sports rates also did not differ between groups (all, > .05). Finally, there was no difference between groups regarding postoperative pain, function, and subjective instability scores (all, > .05). Results of the multivariate regression analysis showed that increased age was a weak independent risk factor for subjective recurrent posterior shoulder instability (odds ratio, 1.04; = .036).
Surgical positioning for arthroscopic posterior shoulder labral repair did not affect postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Both beach-chair and lateral decubitus position provided good outcomes for posterior shoulder labral repair, with an overall recurrence rate of 8.7%. Increased age was a weak independent risk factor for subjective recurrent instability.
在肩关节镜手术中,常采用沙滩椅位和侧卧位来进行手术,两种体位各有优缺点。手术体位通常根据每位医生的喜好来选择,没有哪种体位具有明显的优势。
目的/假设:本研究旨在比较沙滩椅位与侧卧位行肩关节镜下后盂唇修复术患者的临床和患者报告的结果。我们假设患者体位不会影响临床和患者报告的结果。
队列研究;证据等级,3 级。
从病历中获取了 2015 年至 2019 年间所有诊断为当前操作术语(Current Procedural Terminology,CPT)代码 29806 和 29807 的患者列表。只有行肩关节镜下后盂唇修复术且同时行上盂唇前-后修复术的患者才被纳入研究。纳入符合条件的患者的数据包括使用的锚钉数量、围手术期和术后并发症、复发性脱位、主观不稳定、再次手术和翻修。还联系了患者以完成几项患者报告的结果调查。比较沙滩椅位与侧卧位行手术患者的术前数据、围手术期数据和术后结果。
共有 126 例患者纳入研究,其中 69 例患者在侧卧位下进行手术,57 例患者在沙滩椅位下进行手术,平均随访时间为 2.6±1.7 年。两组患者在术前和围手术期均无显著差异。两组患者术后脱位、主观不稳定、再次手术、翻修、所有并发症和重返运动的发生率也无差异(均,>0.05)。此外,两组患者的术后疼痛、功能和主观不稳定评分也无差异(均,>0.05)。多元回归分析结果显示,年龄增加是主观复发性肩关节后脱位的一个较弱的独立危险因素(比值比,1.04;P=0.036)。
肩关节镜下后盂唇修复术的手术体位并未影响术后的临床和患者报告的结果。沙滩椅位和侧卧位均为后盂唇修复提供了良好的效果,总体复发率为 8.7%。年龄增加是主观复发性不稳定的一个较弱的独立危险因素。