• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人和老年人中重叠记忆的神经恢复。

Neural Reinstatement of Overlapping Memories in Young and Older Adults.

机构信息

Georgia Institute of Technology.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;34(8):1376-1396. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01871.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01871
PMID:35604351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9460962/
Abstract

When we update our episodic memories with new information, mnemonic competition between old and new memories may result because of the presence of shared features. Behavioral studies suggest that this competition can lead to proactive interference, resulting in unsuccessful memory updating, particularly for older adults. It is difficult with behavioral data alone to measure the reactivation of old, overlapping memories during retrieval and its impact on memory for new memories. Here, we applied encoding-retrieval representational similarity (ERS) analysis to EEG data to estimate event-specific encoding-related neural reinstatement of old associations during the retrieval of new ones and its impact on memory for new associations in young and older adults. Our results showed that older adults' new associative memory performance was more negatively impacted by proactive interference from old memories than that of young adults. In both age groups, ERS for old associative memories was greater for trials for which new associative memories were forgotten than remembered. In contrast, ERS for new associative memories was greater when they were remembered than forgotten. In addition, older adults showed relatively attenuated target (i.e., new associates) and lure (i.e., old associates) ERS effects compared to younger adults. Collectively, these results suggest that the neural reinstatement of interfering memories during retrieval contributes to proactive interference across age, whereas overall attenuated ERS effect in older adults might reflect their reduced memory fidelity.

摘要

当我们用新信息更新情景记忆时,由于存在共享特征,新旧记忆之间可能会发生记忆竞争。行为研究表明,这种竞争会导致前摄干扰,从而导致记忆更新失败,尤其是对老年人而言。仅通过行为数据很难衡量在检索过程中旧的、重叠记忆的重新激活及其对新记忆的影响。在这里,我们应用编码-检索代表性相似性(ERS)分析来测量 EEG 数据,以估计在检索新记忆时旧关联的特定事件相关神经再激活及其对年轻和老年成年人新关联记忆的影响。我们的结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人的新联想记忆表现受到旧记忆前摄干扰的负面影响更大。在两个年龄组中,对于新联想记忆被遗忘而不是被记住的试验,旧联想记忆的 ERS 更大。相比之下,当新联想记忆被记住时,其 ERS 会更大。此外,与年轻人相比,老年人的目标(即新联想)和诱饵(即旧联想)ERS 效应相对减弱。总的来说,这些结果表明,在检索过程中干扰记忆的神经再激活会导致跨年龄的前摄干扰,而老年人整体减弱的 ERS 效应可能反映了他们记忆保真度的降低。

相似文献

1
Neural Reinstatement of Overlapping Memories in Young and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人中重叠记忆的神经恢复。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;34(8):1376-1396. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01871.
2
Neural reinstatement of context memory in adults with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍成人中海马体上下文记忆的神经恢复。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8546-8556. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad139.
3
Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.在检索过程中重新引入特定项目的上下文细节会支持与重组相关的错误记忆。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118033. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Age-related changes in neural oscillations supporting context memory retrieval.支持情境记忆检索的神经振荡的年龄相关变化。
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:40-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Memory guides the processing of event changes for older and younger adults.记忆指导老年人和年轻人处理事件变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):30-50. doi: 10.1037/xge0000458. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Individual-specific and shared representations during episodic memory encoding and retrieval.个体特异性和共享表示在情景记忆编码和检索期间。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116909. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116909. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Recalled through this day but forgotten next week?-retrieval activity predicts durability of partly consolidated memories.通过这一天回忆,但下周就忘记了?——检索活动预测部分巩固记忆的持久性。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jun 4;34(6). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae233.
8
Age-related differences in encoding-retrieval similarity and their relationship to false memory.编码-提取相似性中的年龄相关差异及其与错误记忆的关系。
Neurobiol Aging. 2022 May;113:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
9
The time course of encoding specific and gist episodic memory representations among young and older adults.年轻人和老年人中编码特定情节记忆和要点情节记忆表征的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jun;153(6):1671-1697. doi: 10.1037/xge0001589. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory.神经再激活揭示了记忆更新的机制。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3453-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5846-11.2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural reinstatement of context memory in adults with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍成人中海马体上下文记忆的神经恢复。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8546-8556. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad139.

本文引用的文献

1
Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.在检索过程中重新引入特定项目的上下文细节会支持与重组相关的错误记忆。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118033. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Alpha/beta power decreases during episodic memory formation predict the magnitude of alpha/beta power decreases during subsequent retrieval.在情节记忆形成过程中,阿尔法/贝塔功率的降低预测了随后检索过程中阿尔法/贝塔功率降低的幅度。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Mar 12;153:107755. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107755. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Hippocampal Theta Oscillations Support Successful Associative Memory Formation.
海马体θ振荡支持成功的联想记忆形成。
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9507-9518. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0767-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Age Differences In Retrieval-Related Reinstatement Reflect Age-Related Dedifferentiation At Encoding.年龄相关的提取相关再巩固差异反映了编码时与年龄相关的去分化。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 1;31(1):106-122. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa210.
5
Hippocampal and cortical mechanisms at retrieval explain variability in episodic remembering in older adults.提取过程中海马和皮质的机制解释了老年人情景记忆的可变性。
Elife. 2020 May 29;9:e55335. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55335.
6
How Proactive Interference during New Associative Learning Impacts General and Specific Memory in Young and Old.新联想学习过程中的前摄干扰如何影响年轻和年老个体的一般和特定记忆。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Sep;32(9):1607-1623. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01582. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Alpha Rhythms Reveal When and Where Item and Associative Memories Are Retrieved.阿尔法节律揭示了项目和联想记忆何时以及何处被检索。
J Neurosci. 2020 Mar 18;40(12):2510-2518. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1982-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
A Neural Chronometry of Memory Recall.记忆回忆的神经计时学
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;23(12):1071-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
The importance of diversity in cognitive neuroscience.认知神经科学中多样性的重要性。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Mar;1464(1):181-191. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14268. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
Neural Pattern Similarity Differentially Relates to Memory Performance in Younger and Older Adults.神经模式相似性与年轻和老年成年人的记忆表现存在差异。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 9;39(41):8089-8099. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 9.