• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合性初级保健中的婚姻检查:一项针对现役军人夫妇的随机对照试验。

Marriage checkup in integrated primary care: A randomized controlled trial with active-duty military couples.

机构信息

School of Professional Psychology.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 May;90(5):381-391. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000734.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000734
PMID:35604745
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the efficacy of the marriage checkup, as adapted to integrated primary care settings and active-duty military couples, for improving relationship health and depressive symptoms.

METHOD

Married couples (N = 244, Mage = 32.4, 67.6% Caucasian) in which at least one member was active-duty Air Force were recruited from bases across the U.S. via online advertisement, emails sent from medical clinics to enrolled beneficiaries, social media posts, and flyers, and randomly assigned to active treatment or waitlist control. Treatment and control couples were linked in pairs sequentially and pairs completed nine sets of questionnaires at baseline, 1-, and 6-month posttreatment. Outcome measures included the Couples Satisfaction Index, Intimate Safety Questionnaire, Responsive Attention Scale, Partner Compassion Scale, Communication Skills Test, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.

RESULTS

A three-level multilevel model indicated, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, treatment couples experienced statistically significant small-to-moderate improvements compared to the control group (Cohen's d from 0.21 to 0.55) at 1 month that were sustained at 6 months for relationship satisfaction, responsive attention, compassion toward their partners, communication skills, intimate safety, and depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

A longitudinal randomized control trial of the MC supports the hypothesis that the MC significantly improves relationship satisfaction, intimacy, communication, partner compassion, responsive attention, and depressive symptoms. Implications for theory, treatment, and dissemination are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

本研究评估了婚姻检查(适用于综合初级保健环境和现役军人夫妇)在改善关系健康和抑郁症状方面的效果。

方法

从美国各地的基地通过在线广告、从诊所发送给在册受益人的电子邮件、社交媒体帖子和传单招募已婚夫妇(N=244,Mage=32.4,67.6%为白种人),其中至少有一名成员是现役空军。将治疗组和对照组随机分配到积极治疗或候补对照组。治疗和对照组夫妇按对依次配对,并在基线、1 个月和 6 个月治疗后完成九组问卷。结果测量包括夫妻满意度指数、亲密安全问卷、反应性注意量表、伴侣同情量表、沟通技巧测试和流行病学研究抑郁量表。

结果

三级多层模型表明,在进行多次比较调整后,治疗组与对照组相比,在 1 个月时经历了统计学上显著的小到中度改善(Cohen's d 从 0.21 到 0.55),在 6 个月时对关系满意度、反应性注意、对伴侣的同情、沟通技巧、亲密安全和抑郁症状的改善仍持续存在。

结论

对 MC 的纵向随机对照试验支持了这样的假设,即 MC 显著改善了关系满意度、亲密关系、沟通、伴侣同情、反应性注意和抑郁症状。讨论了理论、治疗和传播的意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Marriage checkup in integrated primary care: A randomized controlled trial with active-duty military couples.综合性初级保健中的婚姻检查:一项针对现役军人夫妇的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 May;90(5):381-391. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000734.
2
The Marriage Checkup: a randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups.婚姻体检:年度关系健康检查的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Aug;82(4):592-604. doi: 10.1037/a0037097. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
Effectiveness of online OurRelationship and ePREP programs for low-income military couples.低收入军婚夫妇的在线 OurRelationship 和 ePREP 项目的有效性。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Oct;88(10):899-906. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000606.
4
Deployment-Related Benefit Finding and Postdeployment Marital Satisfaction in Military Couples. Deployment-Related Benefit Finding and Postdeployment Marital Satisfaction in Military Couples.
Fam Process. 2017 Dec;56(4):915-925. doi: 10.1111/famp.12249. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
Newlyweds' perceptions of partner conflict behaviors and change in intimate safety over time.新婚夫妇对伴侣冲突行为的认知以及亲密安全感随时间的变化。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Feb;31(1):123-128. doi: 10.1037/fam0000244. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Psychological distress and communication quality in military couples after deployment to war.军人夫妇部署参战后的心理困扰与沟通质量。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Jun;34(4):383-391. doi: 10.1037/fam0000589. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Randomized controlled trial protocol to evaluate the effect of an educational intervention using information, motivation and behavioral skills model on sexual satisfaction of new couples in Iran.评价基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的教育干预对伊朗新婚夫妇性满意度影响的随机对照试验方案
Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0821-7.
8
Risk and protective factors predictive of marital instability in U.S. military couples.预测美国军婚不稳定的风险和保护因素。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Aug;36(5):791-802. doi: 10.1037/fam0000949. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
Pulling away: Links among disengaged couple communication, relationship distress, and depressive symptoms.抽离:失和夫妻沟通、关系困扰与抑郁症状的关联。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):280-293. doi: 10.1037/fam0000507. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Addressing Relationship Health Needs in Primary Care: Adapting the Marriage Checkup for Use in Medical Settings with Military Couples.满足初级保健中的关系健康需求:改编婚姻检查以用于军人夫妻的医疗环境。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017 Dec;24(3-4):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9517-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Community-Based Participatory Approach to Evaluating and Adapting an Innovative Family-Based Hypertension Self-Management Intervention for African American Primary Care Patients.一种基于社区参与的方法,用于评估和调整针对非裔美国初级保健患者的创新型家庭高血压自我管理干预措施。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02534-2.
2
Brief relationship support as a selective suicide prevention intervention: Piloting the Relationship Checkup in veteran couples with relationship and mental health concerns.简要关系支持作为一种有选择性的自杀预防干预措施:在有恋爱关系和心理健康问题的退伍军人夫妇中试用恋爱关系检查。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023 Oct;53(5):787-801. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12983. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Randomized controlled trial of the Marriage Checkup: Stress outcomes.
《婚姻检查》随机对照试验:压力结果。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2023 Jan;49(1):242-259. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12620. Epub 2022 Dec 16.