From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;21(2):73-76. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000287. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
To assess emergency department (ED) clinician perception of patient risk, we measured willingness to discharge patients categorized as increased risk by traditional risk stratification modalities for acute coronary syndrome but low risk by a validated high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol (HST-ADP).
This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study distributed to ED clinicians at an urban academic medical center. Four clinical vignettes classified hypothetical patients as low risk for 30-day acute coronary syndrome according to the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Vignettes additionally identified patients with History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin (HEART) scores of 4 or 6 (2 cases each). One patient in each subset had preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). ED clinicians self-reported willingness to discharge patients from the ED on a 10-point Likert scale.
Among 66 eligible participants, 36 (55%) participated in the survey. ED clinicians reported a mean willingness to discharge patients of 6.07 (95% confidence interval, 5.34-6.80). They reported higher mean willingness to discharge patients with HEART scores of 4 compared with those with HEART scores of 6 (mean difference, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-5.03). There were no differences in willingness to discharge regarding presence or absence of CAD or between clinician types (attending, resident, advanced practice provider).
ED clinicians accustomed to the HEART Pathway demonstrated limited willingness to discharge patients from the ED categorized as moderate risk by the HEART score despite simultaneous classification as low risk by the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Willingness to discharge was higher with lower HEART scores but not affected by the presence of CAD and did not vary between clinician types.
为评估急诊科(ED)临床医生对患者风险的感知,我们测量了愿意将通过传统风险分层方法归类为急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)高风险但通过验证的高敏肌钙蛋白加速诊断方案(HST-ADP)归类为低风险的患者进行出院的意愿。
这是一项在城市学术医疗中心进行的 ED 临床医生横断面描述性调查研究。根据 0/1 小时 HST-ADP,4 个临床案例将假设患者归类为 30 天急性冠状动脉综合征低风险。案例还确定了 HEART 评分分别为 4 或 6(各 2 例)的患者具有病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和初始肌钙蛋白(HEART)。每个亚组中有 1 例患者患有先前存在的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。ED 临床医生在 10 点李克特量表上自我报告愿意将患者从 ED 中出院的意愿。
在 66 名符合条件的参与者中,有 36 名(55%)参与了调查。ED 临床医生报告的平均出院意愿为 6.07(95%置信区间,5.34-6.80)。他们报告说,与 HEART 评分为 6 的患者相比,HEART 评分为 4 的患者更愿意出院(平均差异为 3.61;95%置信区间,2.19-5.03)。无论 CAD 是否存在或临床医生类型(主治医生、住院医师、高级实践提供者)如何,在出院意愿方面均无差异。
习惯于 HEART 通路的 ED 临床医生尽管同时通过 0/1 小时 HST-ADP 归类为低风险,但对 HEART 评分归类为中度风险的患者从 ED 中出院的意愿有限。HEART 评分越低,出院意愿越高,但不受 CAD 存在的影响,且不同临床医生类型之间没有差异。