Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Fırat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Harran University Laboratory and Veterinary Health Vocational School, Birecik, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Anat Histol Embryol. 2022 Jul;51(4):484-491. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12816. Epub 2022 May 24.
The aim of the study was to perform the morphometric analyses on metacarpi of Hamdani sheep via different measurement methods and to compare the methods. Thus, metacarpal bones of 15 females and 15 males were used in the study. Measurements were taken from the measurement points determined on metacarpus via four methods, and their statistical analyses were performed. When both male and female metacarpal bones were examined in the De parameter in the comparison with the methods, it was observed that the four measurement methods were different from one another (p < 0.01). When DEM and DEL measurement parameters were examined in male metacarpus, the highest value was measured in ImageJ and the smallest value was measured in 3D Slicer software; however, it was found that the statistical difference was not significant when compared numerically (p > 0.05). As a result, while it was observed that the measurements made by using digital calliper measurements, photometric analysis, and 3D software were similar in some of the parameters but there was no statistically significant difference; whereas, Statistical difference was detected in some parameters.
本研究旨在通过不同的测量方法对哈迪尼羊的掌骨进行形态测量学分析,并对这些方法进行比较。为此,本研究使用了 15 只雌性和 15 只雄性的掌骨。通过四种方法从掌骨上确定的测量点进行测量,并对其进行了统计学分析。在与方法比较的 De 参数中检查雄性和雌性掌骨时,观察到四种测量方法彼此不同(p<0.01)。在雄性掌骨中检查 DEM 和 DEL 测量参数时,ImageJ 测量的数值最高,3D Slicer 软件测量的数值最低;然而,数值比较时发现统计学差异不显著(p>0.05)。因此,虽然使用数字卡尺测量、光度分析和 3D 软件进行的测量在某些参数上相似,但没有统计学上的显著差异;然而,在一些参数中检测到了统计学差异。